PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXK.L vs. XKS2.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXK.L vs. XKS2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLXK.L is traded in USD, while XKS2.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XKS2.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXK.L achieves a 71.91% return, which is significantly higher than XKS2.L's 66.61% return.


FLXK.L

1D
-2.04%
1M
-22.39%
6M
50.11%
YTD
71.91%
1Y
137.12%
3Y*
38.47%
5Y*
15.20%
10Y*

XKS2.L

1D
-1.72%
1M
-22.20%
6M
45.48%
YTD
66.61%
1Y
134.33%
3Y*
36.96%
5Y*
14.25%
10Y*
14.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXK.L vs. XKS2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLXK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
71.91%94.79%-21.63%20.77%-28.01%-6.85%47.31%13.27%
XKS2.L
Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C
66.61%99.81%-22.97%19.42%-28.16%-8.05%42.89%14.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXK.L and XKS2.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019

0.96

The correlation between FLXK.L and XKS2.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXK.L vs. XKS2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXK.L
FLXK.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FLXK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

XKS2.L
XKS2.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
XKS2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XKS2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
XKS2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XKS2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
XKS2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXK.L vs. XKS2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLXK.LXKS2.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.45

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.32

5.30

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.39

16.95

+0.44

FLXK.L vs. XKS2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXK.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is comparable to the XKS2.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXK.L and XKS2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLXK.L vs. XKS2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXK.L drawdown since its inception was -49.43%, smaller than the maximum XKS2.L drawdown of -83.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXK.L and XKS2.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXK.LXKS2.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.43%

-83.33%

+33.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.64%

-25.22%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.54%

-35.55%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.00%

-47.37%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.64%

-25.22%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.23%

-42.53%

+22.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.86%

7.89%

-0.03%

Volatility

FLXK.L vs. XKS2.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L) have volatilities of 18.88% and 19.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXK.LXKS2.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.88%

19.07%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.57%

39.90%

+1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.12%

43.97%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.63%

32.44%

-2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.60%

28.55%

+1.05%

FLXK.L vs. XKS2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXK.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XKS2.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXK.L vs. XKS2.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLXK.L nor XKS2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FLXK.L and XKS2.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FLXK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XKS2.L.

FLXK.L tracks FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Index (Net Return), while XKS2.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLXK.L and 0.65% for XKS2.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXK.L and XKS2.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer