FLXI.L vs. VPAC.L
FLXI.L (Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF) and VPAC.L (Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD) are both Global Equities funds - FLXI.L tracks the Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF while VPAC.L tracks the Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXI.L returned 4.92%/yr vs 3.51%/yr for VPAC.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLXI.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for VPAC.L.
Performance
FLXI.L vs. VPAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXI.L achieves a -9.22% return, which is significantly lower than VPAC.L's 2.04% return.
FLXI.L
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- 6M
- -7.85%
- YTD
- -9.22%
- 1Y
- -10.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.09%
- 5Y*
- 4.92%
- 10Y*
- —
VPAC.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 5.32%
- 3Y*
- 8.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- —
FLXI.L vs. VPAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXI.L Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF | -9.22% | 2.92% | 10.75% | 22.03% | -8.29% | 24.89% | 13.06% | -0.07% |
VPAC.L Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD | 2.04% | 6.34% | 10.84% | 9.27% | -9.70% | 3.64% | 4.81% | 5.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXI.L and VPAC.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2019 | 0.36 |
The correlation between FLXI.L and VPAC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXI.L vs. VPAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLXI.L
VPAC.L
FLXI.L vs. VPAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLXI.L | VPAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.32 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 2.54 | -3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 9.98 | -11.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLXI.L vs. VPAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXI.L drawdown since its inception was -41.86%, which is greater than VPAC.L's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXI.L and VPAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXI.L | VPAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.86% | -34.25% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.12% | -2.02% | -16.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.99% | -3.40% | -19.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.99% | -13.89% | -9.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.62% | -0.33% | -16.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -3.14% | -5.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.82% | 0.52% | +7.30% |
Volatility
FLXI.L vs. VPAC.L - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.L) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L) at 0.74%. This indicates that FLXI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXI.L | VPAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 0.74% | +3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.02% | 2.28% | +11.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 3.17% | +12.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 5.30% | +11.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 11.00% | +10.38% |
FLXI.L vs. VPAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXI.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than VPAC.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXI.L vs. VPAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLXI.L nor VPAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXI.L and VPAC.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXI.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXI.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPAC.L.
FLXI.L tracks Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF, while VPAC.L tracks Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLXI.L and 0.50% for VPAC.L.
Find the right allocation for FLXI.L and VPAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer