FLXI.DE vs. ESP0.DE
FLXI.DE (Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF) and ESP0.DE (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLXI.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE India 30/18 Capped, while ESP0.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Global Video Gaming and eSports ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXI.DE returned 5.39%/yr vs 6.78%/yr for ESP0.DE. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLXI.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESP0.DE.
Performance
FLXI.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXI.DE achieves a -8.35% return, which is significantly higher than ESP0.DE's -14.34% return.
FLXI.DE
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- -8.35%
- 6M
- -6.99%
- 1Y
- -9.91%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- —
ESP0.DE
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- -14.34%
- 6M
- -14.78%
- 1Y
- -13.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- —
FLXI.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXI.DE Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF | -8.35% | -8.72% | 16.97% | 17.28% | -1.80% | 35.51% | 1.87% | 1.08% |
ESP0.DE VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF | -14.34% | 13.28% | 57.80% | 28.83% | -30.18% | 6.13% | 65.70% | 5.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXI.DE and ESP0.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXI.DE vs. ESP0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FLXI.DE
ESP0.DE
FLXI.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF (ESP0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLXI.DE | ESP0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.88 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | -0.51 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | -0.88 | -0.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLXI.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXI.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.58%, roughly equal to the maximum ESP0.DE drawdown of -40.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXI.DE and ESP0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXI.DE | ESP0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.58% | -40.10% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.84% | -26.47% | +9.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -26.47% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.76% | -40.10% | +15.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.42% | -25.88% | +5.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.81% | -13.10% | +5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.64% | 15.47% | -7.83% |
Volatility
FLXI.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF (ESP0.DE) at 4.38%. This indicates that FLXI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESP0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXI.DE | ESP0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 4.38% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 13.14% | -0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.05% | 17.17% | -2.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 22.48% | -6.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 23.50% | -3.54% |
FLXI.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXI.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ESP0.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXI.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLXI.DE nor ESP0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXI.DE and ESP0.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXI.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXI.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESP0.DE.
FLXI.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while ESP0.DE is Technology Equities. FLXI.DE tracks FTSE India 30/18 Capped, while ESP0.DE tracks MarketVector Global Video Gaming and eSports ESG. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLXI.DE and 0.55% for ESP0.DE.
Find the right allocation for FLXI.DE and ESP0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer