FLXI.DE vs. CW8U.L
FLXI.DE (Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF) and CW8U.L (Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD) are both exchange-traded funds - FLXI.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE India 30/18 Capped, while CW8U.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXI.DE returned 5.39%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for CW8U.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLXI.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CW8U.L.
Performance
FLXI.DE vs. CW8U.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FLXI.DE is traded in EUR, while CW8U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CW8U.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXI.DE achieves a -8.35% return, which is significantly lower than CW8U.L's 10.14% return.
FLXI.DE
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- -8.35%
- 6M
- -6.99%
- 1Y
- -9.91%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- —
CW8U.L
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 10.14%
- 6M
- 11.31%
- 1Y
- 23.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- —
FLXI.DE vs. CW8U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXI.DE Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF | -8.35% | -8.72% | 16.97% | 17.28% | -1.80% | 35.51% | 1.87% | 1.08% |
CW8U.L Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD | 10.14% | 6.04% | 26.88% | 20.34% | -13.16% | 31.22% | 6.24% | 10.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXI.DE and CW8U.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXI.DE vs. CW8U.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLXI.DE
CW8U.L
FLXI.DE vs. CW8U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE) and Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLXI.DE | CW8U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.35 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 3.55 | -4.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 13.02 | -14.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLXI.DE vs. CW8U.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXI.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.58%, which is greater than CW8U.L's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXI.DE and CW8U.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXI.DE | CW8U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.58% | -33.58% | -7.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.84% | -6.52% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -20.74% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.76% | -20.74% | -4.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.42% | -1.09% | -19.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.81% | -4.48% | -3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.64% | 1.78% | +5.86% |
Volatility
FLXI.DE vs. CW8U.L - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8U.L) at 4.03%. This indicates that FLXI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CW8U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXI.DE | CW8U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 4.03% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 9.25% | +3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.05% | 12.34% | +2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 15.09% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 16.57% | +3.39% |
FLXI.DE vs. CW8U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXI.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CW8U.L's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXI.DE vs. CW8U.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLXI.DE nor CW8U.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXI.DE and CW8U.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXI.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXI.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CW8U.L.
FLXI.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while CW8U.L is Global Equities. FLXI.DE tracks FTSE India 30/18 Capped, while CW8U.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLXI.DE and 0.28% for CW8U.L.
Find the right allocation for FLXI.DE and CW8U.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer