PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXE.DE vs. EHDL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXE.DE vs. EHDL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.DE) and Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (EHDL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXE.DE achieves a 16.50% return, which is significantly higher than EHDL.DE's 12.21% return.


FLXE.DE

1D
0.93%
1M
-1.08%
6M
12.18%
YTD
16.50%
1Y
26.03%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*

EHDL.DE

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.47%
6M
8.34%
YTD
12.21%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
13.52%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
6.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXE.DE vs. EHDL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLXE.DE
Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
16.50%13.48%13.20%8.79%-14.00%16.06%-8.15%15.56%-7.69%-13.90%
EHDL.DE
Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
12.21%12.82%8.32%6.17%-10.93%22.11%-15.54%19.11%-2.44%-2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXE.DE and EHDL.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2017

0.75

The correlation between FLXE.DE and EHDL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXE.DE vs. EHDL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXE.DE
FLXE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FLXE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

EHDL.DE
EHDL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EHDL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHDL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHDL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EHDL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHDL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXE.DE vs. EHDL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.DE) and Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (EHDL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLXE.DEEHDL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.37

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

4.48

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.82

11.80

-1.98

FLXE.DE vs. EHDL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the EHDL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXE.DE and EHDL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLXE.DE vs. EHDL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXE.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.02%, roughly equal to the maximum EHDL.DE drawdown of -36.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXE.DE and EHDL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXE.DEEHDL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.02%

-36.13%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.38%

-5.26%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.15%

-14.85%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.56%

-18.80%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-0.99%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.85%

-9.09%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.00%

+0.64%

Volatility

FLXE.DE vs. EHDL.DE - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (EHDL.DE) at 3.21%. This indicates that FLXE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EHDL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXE.DEEHDL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

3.21%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.51%

8.05%

+3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.92%

11.34%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

13.60%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.90%

17.99%

-1.09%

FLXE.DE vs. EHDL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXE.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EHDL.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXE.DE vs. EHDL.DE - Dividend Comparison

FLXE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EHDL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EHDL.DE
Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
4.74%5.27%5.58%6.15%9.20%5.91%4.28%5.04%5.45%5.14%2.24%
FLXE.DE
Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXE.DE and EHDL.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXE.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXE.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EHDL.DE.

FLXE.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while EHDL.DE tracks FTSE Emerging High Dividend Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FLXE.DE and 0.49% for EHDL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXE.DE and EHDL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer