PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXD.DE vs. CEMS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXD.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXD.DE achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly lower than CEMS.DE's 13.72% return.


FLXD.DE

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
10.13%
6M
13.48%
1Y
16.10%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*

CEMS.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
2.64%
YTD
13.72%
6M
16.98%
1Y
32.08%
3Y*
21.63%
5Y*
14.47%
10Y*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXD.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLXD.DE
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
10.13%24.53%12.30%10.31%-0.48%16.07%-3.54%23.52%-7.81%0.44%
CEMS.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
13.72%35.97%9.93%13.90%-4.54%26.62%-8.86%23.48%-14.04%5.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXD.DE and CEMS.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.78

The correlation between FLXD.DE and CEMS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXD.DE vs. CEMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXD.DE
FLXD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FLXD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMS.DE
CEMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXD.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLXD.DECEMS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

3.29

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.21

12.37

-1.15

FLXD.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXD.DE and CEMS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLXD.DECEMS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.37

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.94

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.49

+0.16

Drawdowns

FLXD.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXD.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum CEMS.DE drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXD.DE and CEMS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXD.DECEMS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-40.20%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.02%

-9.99%

+5.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.07%

-17.57%

+7.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.19%

-19.55%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.80%

-1.26%

-2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-7.49%

+3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

2.66%

-1.19%

Volatility

FLXD.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.DE) is 3.50%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that FLXD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXD.DECEMS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

4.65%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

11.17%

-4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70%

13.87%

-5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.66%

15.23%

-3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.11%

17.43%

-3.32%

FLXD.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLXD.DE and CEMS.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLXD.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

FLXD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, while CEMS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEMS.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLXD.DE
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
3.78%4.28%4.31%4.99%5.20%4.61%3.48%4.38%5.45%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXD.DE and CEMS.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXD.DE and CEMS.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

FLXD.DE tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR, while CEMS.DE tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXD.DE and CEMS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer