FLXC.DE vs. XCS6.DE
FLXC.DE (Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF) and XCS6.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C) are both China Equities funds - FLXC.DE tracks the FTSE China 30/18 Capped while XCS6.DE tracks the MSCI China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXC.DE returned -3.95%/yr vs -4.64%/yr for XCS6.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FLXC.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for XCS6.DE.
Performance
FLXC.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXC.DE achieves a -5.94% return, which is significantly higher than XCS6.DE's -7.24% return.
FLXC.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -5.94%
- 6M
- -7.13%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
XCS6.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- -7.24%
- 6M
- -8.74%
- 1Y
- 2.24%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- -4.64%
- 10Y*
- 4.37%
FLXC.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXC.DE Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -5.94% | 17.34% | 27.28% | -15.77% | -15.90% | -14.60% | 16.83% | 19.48% |
XCS6.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C | -7.24% | 16.38% | 27.05% | -15.14% | -15.45% | -17.27% | 15.11% | 19.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXC.DE and XCS6.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2019 | 0.98 |
The correlation between FLXC.DE and XCS6.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXC.DE vs. XCS6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FLXC.DE
XCS6.DE
FLXC.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLXC.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.04 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 0.13 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 0.27 | +0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXC.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 0.12 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | -0.17 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.16 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
FLXC.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXC.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, roughly equal to the maximum XCS6.DE drawdown of -56.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXC.DE and XCS6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXC.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.61% | -56.31% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.19% | -17.28% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.70% | -24.77% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.07% | -49.94% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.89% | -33.60% | +2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.95% | -21.19% | -6.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.38% | 8.27% | -0.89% |
Volatility
FLXC.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) is 6.78%, while Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that FLXC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCS6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXC.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 7.17% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 13.14% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.78% | 18.53% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.71% | 27.67% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.20% | 25.33% | +0.87% |
FLXC.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXC.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XCS6.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXC.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLXC.DE nor XCS6.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, FLXC.DE and XCS6.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FLXC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XCS6.DE.
FLXC.DE tracks FTSE China 30/18 Capped, while XCS6.DE tracks MSCI China. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLXC.DE and 0.65% for XCS6.DE.
Find the right allocation for FLXC.DE and XCS6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer