FLXC.DE vs. EUPA.DE
FLXC.DE (Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF) and EUPA.DE (Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD)) are both exchange-traded funds - FLXC.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 30/18 Capped, while EUPA.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLXC.DE returned 7.94%/yr vs 17.95%/yr for EUPA.DE. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLXC.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for EUPA.DE.
Performance
FLXC.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXC.DE achieves a -5.94% return, which is significantly lower than EUPA.DE's 8.36% return.
FLXC.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -5.94%
- 6M
- -7.13%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
EUPA.DE
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 8.36%
- 6M
- 9.94%
- 1Y
- 17.10%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLXC.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXC.DE Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -5.94% | 17.34% | 27.28% | -18.44% |
EUPA.DE Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) | 8.36% | 18.38% | 13.54% | 11.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXC.DE and EUPA.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2023 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXC.DE vs. EUPA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FLXC.DE
EUPA.DE
FLXC.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) (EUPA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLXC.DE | EUPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.28 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 2.02 | -1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 7.49 | -6.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXC.DE | EUPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 1.57 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 1.30 | -1.21 |
Drawdowns
FLXC.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXC.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, which is greater than EUPA.DE's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXC.DE and EUPA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXC.DE | EUPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.61% | -10.28% | -45.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.19% | -8.44% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.70% | -10.28% | -14.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.89% | -2.77% | -28.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.95% | -1.91% | -26.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.38% | 2.28% | +5.10% |
Volatility
FLXC.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) (EUPA.DE) at 3.63%. This indicates that FLXC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUPA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXC.DE | EUPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 3.63% | +3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 9.03% | +3.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.78% | 10.84% | +6.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.71% | 12.40% | +14.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.20% | 12.40% | +13.80% |
FLXC.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXC.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EUPA.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXC.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLXC.DE nor EUPA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXC.DE and EUPA.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EUPA.DE.
FLXC.DE is categorized as China Equities, while EUPA.DE is Europe Equities. FLXC.DE tracks FTSE China 30/18 Capped, while EUPA.DE tracks Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLXC.DE and 0.65% for EUPA.DE.
Find the right allocation for FLXC.DE and EUPA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer