PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLVCX vs. VITPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLVCX vs. VITPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLVCX achieves a 22.74% return, which is significantly higher than VITPX's 11.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLVCX having a 15.46% annualized return and VITPX not far behind at 15.19%.


FLVCX

1D
1.37%
1M
7.28%
YTD
22.74%
6M
22.44%
1Y
43.21%
3Y*
29.38%
5Y*
14.72%
10Y*
15.46%

VITPX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.76%
YTD
11.99%
6M
11.89%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
15.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLVCX vs. VITPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLVCX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund
22.74%20.34%26.95%26.10%-22.99%26.08%26.74%35.60%-16.43%20.92%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
11.99%17.17%25.43%26.01%-19.48%25.76%20.95%30.87%-5.59%20.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FLVCX and VITPX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2001

0.89

The correlation between FLVCX and VITPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLVCX vs. VITPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLVCX
FLVCX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FLVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FLVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VITPX
VITPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VITPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VITPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLVCX vs. VITPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLVCXVITPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.44

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

3.38

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.91

15.60

-2.69

FLVCX vs. VITPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLVCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the VITPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLVCX and VITPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLVCXVITPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.47

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.78

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.83

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.51

+0.04

Drawdowns

FLVCX vs. VITPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLVCX drawdown since its inception was -70.02%, which is greater than VITPX's maximum drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLVCX and VITPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLVCXVITPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.02%

-55.28%

-14.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.06%

-8.92%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.54%

-19.35%

-9.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.54%

-25.31%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.14%

-34.99%

-9.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.00%

-8.02%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

1.93%

+1.60%

Volatility

FLVCX vs. VITPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) at 2.94%. This indicates that FLVCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VITPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLVCXVITPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

2.94%

+3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.59%

9.19%

+7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.87%

12.19%

+8.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.78%

17.35%

+5.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.38%

18.41%

+4.97%

FLVCX vs. VITPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLVCX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than VITPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLVCX vs. VITPX - Dividend Comparison

FLVCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than VITPX's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLVCX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund
3.85%4.72%14.53%12.19%18.49%8.40%0.11%0.10%19.91%18.96%27.48%6.18%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.24%2.64%4.14%2.41%6.48%5.38%11.57%2.91%3.93%1.90%2.80%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLVCX and VITPX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLVCX has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to VITPX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLVCX dropped -70.02% vs VITPX's -55.28%.

VITPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLVCX and VITPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer