PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLVCX vs. AMFEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLVCX vs. AMFEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLVCX having a 14.11% return and AMFEX slightly higher at 14.42%.


FLVCX

1D
1.95%
1M
-3.39%
6M
10.10%
YTD
14.11%
1Y
20.33%
3Y*
21.85%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
14.91%
ALL TIME*
12.88%

AMFEX

1D
0.75%
1M
1.46%
6M
8.75%
YTD
14.42%
1Y
25.63%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FLVCX vs. AMFEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLVCX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund
14.11%20.34%26.95%26.10%-22.99%26.08%26.74%35.60%-10.17%
AMFEX
AAMA Equity Fund
14.42%17.33%16.28%17.32%-14.08%22.58%12.70%24.62%-9.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FLVCX and AMFEX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018

0.88

The correlation between FLVCX and AMFEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLVCX vs. AMFEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLVCX
FLVCX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FLVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FLVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

AMFEX
AMFEX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AMFEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLVCX vs. AMFEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLVCXAMFEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.42

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

3.96

-2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

16.52

-12.40

FLVCX vs. AMFEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLVCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the AMFEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLVCX and AMFEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLVCX vs. AMFEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLVCX drawdown since its inception was -70.02%, which is greater than AMFEX's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLVCX and AMFEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLVCXAMFEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.02%

-30.41%

-39.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.43%

-6.07%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.54%

-15.23%

-13.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.54%

-21.21%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.14%

0.00%

-10.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.96%

-4.23%

-6.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

1.46%

+2.98%

Volatility

FLVCX vs. AMFEX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) has a higher volatility of 9.28% compared to AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX) at 2.45%. This indicates that FLVCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLVCXAMFEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.28%

2.45%

+6.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.69%

7.77%

+12.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.65%

10.11%

+14.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.53%

14.22%

+9.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.62%

16.84%

+6.78%

FLVCX vs. AMFEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLVCX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFEX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLVCX vs. AMFEX - Dividend Comparison

FLVCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than AMFEX's 10.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMFEX
AAMA Equity Fund
10.48%11.99%9.19%0.92%4.82%0.22%0.44%0.78%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLVCX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund
4.14%4.72%14.53%12.19%18.49%8.40%0.11%0.10%19.91%18.96%27.48%6.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLVCX and AMFEX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLVCX has higher volatility (9.28%) compared to AMFEX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLVCX dropped -70.02% vs AMFEX's -30.41%.

AMFEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLVCX and AMFEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer