FLV vs. DBO
FLV (American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. FLV is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLV returned 8.70%/yr vs 15.36%/yr for DBO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLV charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
FLV vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLV achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return.
FLV
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 6M
- 7.35%
- 1Y
- 20.41%
- 3Y*
- 13.96%
- 5Y*
- 8.70%
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 79.84%
- 6M
- 74.51%
- 1Y
- 77.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
FLV vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 6.93% | 15.80% | 11.51% | 6.23% | 0.94% | 17.30% | 39.27% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 79.84% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | 42.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLV and DBO is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020 | 0.17 |
The correlation between FLV and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FLV vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLV
DBO
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FLV
DBO
Healthcare
FLV
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
FLV
DBO
-
Industrials
FLV
DBO
-
Technology
FLV
DBO
-
Energy
FLV
DBO
-
Utilities
FLV
DBO
-
Communication Services
FLV
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
FLV
DBO
-
Basic Materials
FLV
DBO
-
Real Estate
FLV
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLV vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
FLV
DBO
FLV vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLV | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 4.28 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 8.69 | -0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLV | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 2.25 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.48 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.02 | +1.07 |
Drawdowns
FLV vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLV drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLV and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLV | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -90.18% | +75.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -18.19% | +10.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.42% | -28.20% | +15.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.06% | -37.68% | +22.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -52.68% | +51.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -62.25% | +59.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 8.94% | -6.54% |
Volatility
FLV vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) is 2.50%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that FLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLV | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 12.79% | -10.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.31% | 28.32% | -21.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.08% | 34.58% | -24.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.71% | 32.31% | -19.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 31.79% | -17.53% |
FLV vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLV vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
FLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than DBO's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.95% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 1.65% | 1.90% | 2.07% | 2.07% | 4.98% | 4.05% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLV and DBO have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to FLV (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLV dropped -15.06% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.36% vs 8.70% for FLV. On fees, FLV is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, FLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.36% return vs 8.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLV is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.65% for FLV.
FLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for FLV and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLV and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer