PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAKT vs. CRDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DAKT vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAKT achieves a -1.72% return, which is significantly lower than CRDO's 49.14% return.


DAKT

1D
-3.76%
1M
0.88%
YTD
-1.72%
6M
8.06%
1Y
38.10%
3Y*
44.72%
5Y*
23.18%
10Y*
13.99%

CRDO

1D
-6.29%
1M
19.18%
YTD
49.14%
6M
13.43%
1Y
198.39%
3Y*
135.36%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAKT vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DAKT
Daktronics, Inc.
-1.72%17.26%98.82%200.71%-41.13%
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
49.14%114.09%245.20%46.28%14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between DAKT and CRDO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DAKT:

$962.33M

CRDO:

$41.35B

EPS

DAKT:

$0.55

CRDO:

$2.50

PE Ratio

DAKT:

35.02

CRDO:

85.99

PEG Ratio

DAKT:

0.04

CRDO:

0.07

PS Ratio

DAKT:

1.20

CRDO:

30.42

PB Ratio

DAKT:

3.28

CRDO:

20.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

DAKT:

$802.65M

CRDO:

$1.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DAKT:

$213.67M

CRDO:

$908.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

DAKT:

$41.38M

CRDO:

$463.79M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAKT vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAKT
DAKT Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
DAKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAKT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DAKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAKT Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDO
CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAKT vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAKTCRDODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

2.35

-1.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

2.71

-1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.32

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

3.73

-2.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.12

8.99

-6.87

DAKT vs. CRDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAKT Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the CRDO Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAKT and CRDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAKTCRDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

2.35

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

1.18

-0.99

Drawdowns

DAKT vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAKT drawdown since its inception was -92.96%, which is greater than CRDO's maximum drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAKT and CRDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAKTCRDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.96%

-62.04%

-30.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.34%

-53.59%

+22.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.00%

-61.05%

+19.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.93%

-9.08%

-20.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.14%

-19.49%

-30.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.98%

22.17%

-4.19%

Volatility

DAKT vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) is 9.08%, while Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a volatility of 28.92%. This indicates that DAKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAKTCRDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.08%

28.92%

-19.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.07%

64.87%

-31.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.04%

86.00%

-38.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.18%

81.41%

-29.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.87%

81.41%

-35.54%

Dividends

DAKT vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison

Neither DAKT nor CRDO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DAKT
Daktronics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.07%3.61%3.78%3.07%3.18%4.59%

Financials

DAKT vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Daktronics, Inc. and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
181.87M
437.00M
(DAKT) Total Revenue
(CRDO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DAKT vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Daktronics, Inc. and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
24.0%
68.2%
Portfolio components
DAKT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Daktronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 43.63M and revenue of 181.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.0%.

CRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

DAKT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Daktronics, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92M and revenue of 181.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

CRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.

DAKT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Daktronics, Inc. reported a net income of 3.01M and revenue of 181.87M, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.

CRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DAKT and CRDO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRDO has higher volatility (28.92%) compared to DAKT (9.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAKT dropped -92.96% vs CRDO's -62.04%.

CRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAKT and CRDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer