PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLUVX vs. FSMUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLUVX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income Fund Class M (FLUVX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLUVX achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than FSMUX's 2.26% return.


FLUVX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.80%
6M
1.97%
YTD
1.97%
1Y
6.71%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*

FSMUX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.00%
6M
2.26%
YTD
2.26%
1Y
6.80%
3Y*
3.95%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLUVX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FLUVX
Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income Fund Class M
1.97%4.83%1.45%6.55%-10.99%0.08%
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
2.26%3.14%2.99%6.78%-11.25%0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FLUVX and FSMUX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021

0.88

The correlation between FLUVX and FSMUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLUVX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLUVX
FLUVX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FLUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMUX
FSMUX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FSMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLUVX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income Fund Class M (FLUVX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLUVXFSMUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.69

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.98

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.01

10.97

-3.96

FLUVX vs. FSMUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the FSMUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUVX and FSMUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLUVX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUVX drawdown since its inception was -16.48%, roughly equal to the maximum FSMUX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUVX and FSMUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLUVXFSMUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.48%

-16.27%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

-2.68%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.12%

-5.95%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.48%

-16.27%

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

0.00%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-5.37%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.71%

+0.26%

Volatility

FLUVX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income Fund Class M (FLUVX) is 0.44%, while Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) has a volatility of 0.50%. This indicates that FLUVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLUVXFSMUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

0.50%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.14%

2.10%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71%

3.09%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.14%

4.63%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.48%

4.61%

-0.13%

FLUVX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLUVX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLUVX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison

FLUVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than FSMUX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLUVX
Fidelity Advisor Municipal Income Fund Class M
2.76%3.59%2.67%2.32%1.79%2.39%2.68%2.86%2.31%
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
2.98%3.26%3.74%3.18%2.14%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLUVX and FSMUX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMUX has higher volatility (0.50%) compared to FLUVX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLUVX dropped -16.48% vs FSMUX's -16.27%.

FSMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLUVX and FSMUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer