PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLUIX vs. TILVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLUIX vs. TILVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class I (FLUIX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLUIX achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than TILVX's 14.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLUIX having a 11.09% annualized return and TILVX not far ahead at 11.10%.


FLUIX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.56%
YTD
7.15%
6M
9.41%
1Y
21.03%
3Y*
17.87%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
11.09%

TILVX

1D
0.79%
1M
4.27%
YTD
14.30%
6M
14.82%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
11.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLUIX vs. TILVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLUIX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class I
7.15%15.98%17.27%14.45%-5.51%25.71%4.10%24.61%-9.31%12.26%
TILVX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund
14.30%15.81%14.26%11.49%-7.57%25.05%2.90%26.48%-8.38%10.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FLUIX and TILVX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.98

The correlation between FLUIX and TILVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLUIX vs. TILVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLUIX
FLUIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FLUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FLUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TILVX
TILVX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TILVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TILVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLUIX vs. TILVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class I (FLUIX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLUIXTILVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

2.70

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.93

3.81

-0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.49

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

4.30

-1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.22

18.01

-5.79

FLUIX vs. TILVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the TILVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUIX and TILVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLUIXTILVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.70

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.71

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.63

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.48

-0.08

Drawdowns

FLUIX vs. TILVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUIX drawdown since its inception was -58.86%, roughly equal to the maximum TILVX drawdown of -60.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUIX and TILVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLUIXTILVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.86%

-60.05%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.04%

-6.80%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.61%

-15.58%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.33%

-19.00%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.73%

-40.15%

+0.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

0.00%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

-8.26%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

1.62%

+0.11%

Volatility

FLUIX vs. TILVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class I (FLUIX) is 2.67%, while TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that FLUIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TILVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLUIXTILVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

3.04%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.87%

8.19%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.48%

10.84%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.46%

14.82%

+0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

17.66%

+0.05%

FLUIX vs. TILVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLUIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TILVX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLUIX vs. TILVX - Dividend Comparison

FLUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.21%, more than TILVX's 5.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLUIX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class I
9.21%8.02%10.37%2.48%8.26%4.34%2.28%0.39%7.58%1.12%1.29%1.24%
TILVX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund
5.21%5.96%3.04%4.90%4.57%3.77%2.26%7.05%4.68%2.01%3.14%4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FLUIX and TILVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TILVX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to FLUIX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLUIX dropped -58.86% vs TILVX's -60.05%.

TILVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLUIX and TILVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer