PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLUC.L vs. ERNE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLUC.L vs. ERNE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (FLUC.L) and iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (ERNE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLUC.L is traded in USD, while ERNE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ERNE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLUC.L achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly lower than ERNE.L's -1.17% return.


FLUC.L

1D
-1.05%
1M
-1.47%
6M
-1.26%
YTD
-1.26%
1Y
3.65%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
-0.47%
10Y*

ERNE.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.78%
6M
-0.39%
YTD
-1.17%
1Y
1.06%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
1.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLUC.L vs. ERNE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLUC.L
Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
-1.26%7.46%2.08%7.77%-15.53%-2.24%9.76%14.52%0.68%
ERNE.L
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-1.17%16.37%-2.29%6.65%-6.24%-7.15%8.93%-1.63%-2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FLUC.L and ERNE.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2018

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLUC.L vs. ERNE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLUC.L
FLUC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FLUC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLUC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLUC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FLUC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLUC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ERNE.L
ERNE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ERNE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLUC.L vs. ERNE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (FLUC.L) and iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (ERNE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLUC.LERNE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.02

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

0.14

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

0.30

+3.48

FLUC.L vs. ERNE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the ERNE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUC.L and ERNE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLUC.L vs. ERNE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUC.L drawdown since its inception was -22.30%, smaller than the maximum ERNE.L drawdown of -31.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUC.L and ERNE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLUC.LERNE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.30%

-31.67%

+9.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.61%

-4.98%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.07%

-7.47%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-20.15%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.60%

-8.08%

+4.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.53%

-16.42%

+9.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

2.38%

-1.43%

Volatility

FLUC.L vs. ERNE.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (FLUC.L) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (ERNE.L) at 1.39%. This indicates that FLUC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERNE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLUC.LERNE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

1.39%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.90%

4.60%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.04%

6.27%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.78%

7.67%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.09%

7.33%

-0.24%

FLUC.L vs. ERNE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLUC.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ERNE.L's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLUC.L vs. ERNE.L - Dividend Comparison

FLUC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than ERNE.L's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERNE.L
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.33%2.74%3.80%2.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.13%
FLUC.L
Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.26%4.01%4.26%3.38%2.76%2.17%2.29%3.37%1.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLUC.L and ERNE.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERNE.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNE.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLUC.L.

FLUC.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ERNE.L is Ultrashort Bond. FLUC.L tracks Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF, while ERNE.L tracks Markit iBoxx EUR Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index (EUR). They also come from different issuers: Franklin and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLUC.L and 0.09% for ERNE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLUC.L and ERNE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer