PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLUAX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLUAX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class A (FLUAX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLUAX achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's 9.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FLUAX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 11.28%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.44% annualized return.


FLUAX

1D
0.41%
1M
2.33%
6M
10.13%
YTD
13.58%
1Y
25.88%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
11.28%
ALL TIME*
7.86%

FSKAX

1D
1.63%
1M
-0.80%
6M
8.19%
YTD
9.87%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
14.44%
ALL TIME*
14.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FLUAX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLUAX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class A
13.58%15.63%16.94%14.09%-5.77%25.27%3.86%24.29%-9.57%11.95%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
9.87%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FLUAX and FSKAX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011

0.89

The correlation between FLUAX and FSKAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLUAX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLUAX
FLUAX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FLUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FLUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLUAX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class A (FLUAX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLUAXFSKAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.25

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

2.09

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.70

8.96

+4.73

FLUAX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUAX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLUAX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUAX drawdown since its inception was -59.15%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUAX and FSKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLUAXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.15%

-35.01%

-24.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-8.92%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.57%

-19.43%

+3.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.48%

-25.39%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.72%

-35.01%

-4.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-1.97%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.65%

-3.99%

-5.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

2.08%

-0.37%

Volatility

FLUAX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class A (FLUAX) is 3.06%, while Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that FLUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLUAXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

3.43%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

10.33%

-2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.82%

13.21%

-2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

17.52%

-2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.66%

18.45%

-0.79%

FLUAX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLUAX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLUAX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

FLUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.68%, more than FSKAX's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLUAX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class A
8.68%7.97%10.24%2.27%8.11%4.19%1.94%1.45%7.28%0.79%1.06%0.98%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.95%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLUAX and FSKAX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSKAX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to FLUAX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLUAX dropped -59.15% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

FLUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLUAX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer