PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTR.L vs. BA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FLTR.L vs. BA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Flutter Entertainment plc (FLTR.L) and BAE Systems plc (BA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTR.L achieves a -50.01% return, which is significantly lower than BA.L's 12.71% return.


FLTR.L

1D
-3.33%
1M
15.53%
YTD
-50.01%
6M
-51.70%
1Y
-59.06%
3Y*
-20.04%
5Y*
-10.32%
10Y*

BA.L

1D
-1.62%
1M
3.27%
YTD
12.71%
6M
13.60%
1Y
0.36%
3Y*
28.80%
5Y*
32.37%
10Y*
18.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTR.L vs. BA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLTR.L
Flutter Entertainment plc
-50.01%-22.15%48.64%23.47%-4.00%-22.17%69.22%64.62%
BA.L
BAE Systems plc
12.71%52.12%5.88%33.31%60.92%17.57%-9.28%27.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTR.L and BA.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2019

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLTR.L:

£14.27B

BA.L:

£57.97B

EPS

FLTR.L:

-$4.14

BA.L:

£1.33

PS Ratio

FLTR.L:

0.81

BA.L:

1.06

PB Ratio

FLTR.L:

2.12

BA.L:

4.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLTR.L:

$23.82B

BA.L:

£54.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLTR.L:

$7.40B

BA.L:

£4.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

FLTR.L:

$3.03B

BA.L:

£7.55B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTR.L vs. BA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTR.L
FLTR.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FLTR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

BA.L
BA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTR.L vs. BA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flutter Entertainment plc (FLTR.L) and BAE Systems plc (BA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLTR.LBA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.70

1.04

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

0.15

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.39

0.33

-1.71

FLTR.L vs. BA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTR.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.41, which is lower than the BA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTR.L and BA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLTR.L vs. BA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTR.L drawdown since its inception was -70.59%, which is greater than BA.L's maximum drawdown of -43.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR.L and BA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTR.LBA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.59%

-43.67%

-26.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.91%

-21.30%

-48.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.59%

-21.30%

-49.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.59%

-21.30%

-49.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.87%

-17.12%

-48.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.06%

-12.74%

-6.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.67%

9.84%

+32.83%

Volatility

FLTR.L vs. BA.L - Volatility Comparison

Flutter Entertainment plc (FLTR.L) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to BAE Systems plc (BA.L) at 8.48%. This indicates that FLTR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTR.LBA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.29%

8.48%

+3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.23%

23.43%

+10.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.97%

29.85%

+12.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.82%

25.82%

+12.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.65%

25.07%

+13.58%

Dividends

FLTR.L vs. BA.L - Dividend Comparison

FLTR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BA.L
BAE Systems plc
1.90%1.99%2.69%2.53%2.99%4.40%4.75%4.00%4.79%3.75%3.57%4.14%
FLTR.L
Flutter Entertainment plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FLTR.L vs. BA.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flutter Entertainment plc and BAE Systems plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
12.18B
14.77B
(FLTR.L) Total Revenue
(BA.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FLTR.L values in USD, BA.L values in GBP

FLTR.L vs. BA.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Flutter Entertainment plc and BAE Systems plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
17.3%
9.2%
Portfolio components
FLTR.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flutter Entertainment plc reported a gross profit of 2.11B and revenue of 12.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.3%.

BA.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported a gross profit of 1.35B and revenue of 14.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.

FLTR.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flutter Entertainment plc reported an operating income of 258.00M and revenue of 12.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.

BA.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported an operating income of 1.35B and revenue of 14.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

FLTR.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flutter Entertainment plc reported a net income of -334.62M and revenue of 12.18B, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.

BA.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.77B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FLTR.L and BA.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTR.L and BA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer