PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSHX vs. SSBRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSHX vs. SSBRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2040 Retirement Target Fund (FLSHX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSHX achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than SSBRX's 6.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FLSHX has outperformed SSBRX with an annualized return of 10.46%, while SSBRX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.95% annualized return.


FLSHX

1D
0.34%
1M
4.73%
YTD
10.26%
6M
11.02%
1Y
24.42%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
10.46%

SSBRX

1D
0.15%
1M
2.05%
YTD
6.74%
6M
6.99%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
11.97%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
7.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSHX vs. SSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLSHX
Franklin LifeSmart 2040 Retirement Target Fund
10.26%19.16%13.73%17.66%-16.84%16.35%15.32%21.68%-6.82%18.88%
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
6.74%12.93%8.73%13.61%-15.51%10.03%14.68%20.73%-5.47%14.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSHX and SSBRX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.93

The correlation between FLSHX and SSBRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSHX vs. SSBRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSHX
FLSHX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FLSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SSBRX
SSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSHX vs. SSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2040 Retirement Target Fund (FLSHX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSHXSSBRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.44

2.91

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.42

4.22

-0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.58

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.58

-0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.54

16.33

-2.79

FLSHX vs. SSBRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the SSBRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSHX and SSBRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSHXSSBRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.91

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.62

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.81

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.74

-0.16

Drawdowns

FLSHX vs. SSBRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSHX drawdown since its inception was -36.65%, which is greater than SSBRX's maximum drawdown of -21.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSHX and SSBRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSHXSSBRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.65%

-21.96%

-14.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-4.44%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.07%

-7.48%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.65%

-21.13%

-15.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.65%

-21.96%

-14.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.20%

-3.72%

-4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

0.97%

+0.86%

Volatility

FLSHX vs. SSBRX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LifeSmart 2040 Retirement Target Fund (FLSHX) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) at 1.74%. This indicates that FLSHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSHXSSBRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

1.74%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.24%

4.36%

+3.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

5.48%

+4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.72%

8.83%

+8.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.07%

9.82%

+6.25%

FLSHX vs. SSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSHX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SSBRX's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLSHX vs. SSBRX - Dividend Comparison

FLSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, which matches SSBRX's 5.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLSHX
Franklin LifeSmart 2040 Retirement Target Fund
5.66%6.40%3.27%2.66%4.16%23.09%3.21%2.60%4.75%2.02%1.63%2.98%
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
5.68%6.07%6.67%4.60%6.60%6.44%4.74%6.58%5.35%0.60%1.84%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FLSHX and SSBRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLSHX has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to SSBRX (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSHX dropped -36.65% vs SSBRX's -21.96%.

SSBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSHX and SSBRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer