FLSHX vs. PDIZX
FLSHX (Franklin LifeSmart 2040 Retirement Target Fund) and PDIZX (Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FLSHX returned 9.19%/yr vs 6.34%/yr for PDIZX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLSHX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PDIZX.
Performance
FLSHX vs. PDIZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLSHX achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than PDIZX's 4.70% return.
FLSHX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 24.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
PDIZX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 4.70%
- 6M
- 5.10%
- 1Y
- 13.81%
- 3Y*
- 12.53%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- —
FLSHX vs. PDIZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSHX Franklin LifeSmart 2040 Retirement Target Fund | 10.26% | 19.16% | 13.73% | 17.66% | -16.84% | 16.35% | 14.57% |
PDIZX Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund | 4.70% | 11.93% | 8.54% | 18.82% | -14.27% | 12.07% | 11.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLSHX and PDIZX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FLSHX and PDIZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLSHX vs. PDIZX — Risk / Return Rank
FLSHX
PDIZX
FLSHX vs. PDIZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2040 Retirement Target Fund (FLSHX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund (PDIZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLSHX | PDIZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.44 | 2.62 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.42 | 3.85 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.50 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 3.55 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.54 | 16.09 | -2.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLSHX | PDIZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 2.62 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.74 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.75 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
FLSHX vs. PDIZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLSHX drawdown since its inception was -36.65%, which is greater than PDIZX's maximum drawdown of -21.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSHX and PDIZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLSHX | PDIZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.65% | -21.03% | -15.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.16% | -3.96% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.07% | -7.31% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.65% | -18.97% | -17.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.20% | -4.33% | -3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 0.87% | +0.96% |
Volatility
FLSHX vs. PDIZX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin LifeSmart 2040 Retirement Target Fund (FLSHX) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund (PDIZX) at 1.70%. This indicates that FLSHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDIZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLSHX | PDIZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.96% | 1.70% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 4.25% | +3.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 5.37% | +4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 8.62% | +9.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 10.46% | +5.61% |
FLSHX vs. PDIZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLSHX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PDIZX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLSHX vs. PDIZX - Dividend Comparison
FLSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, less than PDIZX's 7.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSHX Franklin LifeSmart 2040 Retirement Target Fund | 5.66% | 6.40% | 3.27% | 2.66% | 4.16% | 23.09% | 3.21% | 2.60% | 4.75% | 2.02% | 1.63% | 2.98% |
PDIZX Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund | 7.29% | 7.63% | 4.91% | 3.15% | 7.76% | 12.48% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FLSHX and PDIZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FLSHX has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to PDIZX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSHX dropped -36.65% vs PDIZX's -21.03%.
PDIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLSHX and PDIZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer