PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRYX vs. VITPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLRYX vs. VITPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund (FLRYX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRYX achieves a 11.04% return, which is significantly lower than VITPX's 11.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLRYX having a 14.70% annualized return and VITPX not far ahead at 15.19%.


FLRYX

1D
0.64%
1M
4.59%
YTD
11.04%
6M
11.43%
1Y
29.51%
3Y*
22.93%
5Y*
11.71%
10Y*
14.70%

VITPX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.76%
YTD
11.99%
6M
11.89%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
15.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRYX vs. VITPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLRYX
Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund
11.04%15.60%25.36%28.54%-18.45%21.34%12.64%31.30%-7.71%24.95%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
11.99%17.17%25.43%26.01%-19.48%25.76%20.95%30.87%-5.59%20.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRYX and VITPX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2003

0.97

The correlation between FLRYX and VITPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLRYX vs. VITPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRYX
FLRYX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FLRYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VITPX
VITPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VITPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VITPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRYX vs. VITPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund (FLRYX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLRYXVITPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.38

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.81

15.60

-1.78

FLRYX vs. VITPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the VITPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRYX and VITPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLRYXVITPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.47

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.78

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.83

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.51

+0.03

Drawdowns

FLRYX vs. VITPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRYX drawdown since its inception was -56.34%, roughly equal to the maximum VITPX drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRYX and VITPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRYXVITPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.34%

-55.28%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.04%

-8.92%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.52%

-19.35%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.52%

-25.31%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.73%

-34.99%

+0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.49%

-8.02%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

1.93%

+0.29%

Volatility

FLRYX vs. VITPX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund (FLRYX) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) at 2.94%. This indicates that FLRYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VITPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLRYXVITPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

2.94%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

9.19%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.74%

12.19%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.04%

17.35%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.54%

18.41%

+1.13%

FLRYX vs. VITPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRYX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VITPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLRYX vs. VITPX - Dividend Comparison

FLRYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than VITPX's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRYX
Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund
6.33%7.03%12.88%2.39%6.74%17.27%0.97%1.34%4.56%0.70%0.62%0.50%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.24%2.64%4.14%2.41%6.48%5.38%11.57%2.91%3.93%1.90%2.80%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FLRYX and VITPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLRYX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to VITPX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRYX dropped -56.34% vs VITPX's -55.28%.

VITPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLRYX and VITPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer