FLRYX vs. QCELX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLRYX (Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund) and QCELX (AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FLRYX returned 14.70%/yr vs 15.20%/yr for QCELX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLRYX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for QCELX.

Performance

FLRYX vs. QCELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund (FLRYX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRYX achieves a 11.04% return, which is significantly lower than QCELX's 18.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLRYX having a 14.70% annualized return and QCELX not far ahead at 15.20%.

FLRYX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 4.59%
• YTD: 11.04%
• 6M: 11.43%
• 1Y: 29.51%
• 3Y*: 22.93%
• 5Y*: 11.71%
• 10Y*: 14.70%

QCELX

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 6.79%
• YTD: 18.09%
• 6M: 19.95%
• 1Y: 38.37%
• 3Y*: 27.48%
• 5Y*: 16.17%
• 10Y*: 15.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRYX vs. QCELX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLRYX Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund	11.04%	15.60%	25.36%	28.54%	-18.45%	21.34%	12.64%	31.30%	-7.71%	24.95%
QCELX AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund	18.09%	23.38%	22.73%	26.30%	-15.73%	27.18%	14.93%	24.33%	-10.96%	22.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRYX and QCELX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.95

The correlation between FLRYX and QCELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLRYX vs. QCELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRYX

FLRYX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FLRYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FLRYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
FLRYX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FLRYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FLRYX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

QCELX

QCELX Risk / Return Rank: 90
QCELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
QCELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
QCELX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QCELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QCELX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRYX vs. QCELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund (FLRYX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLRYX	QCELX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	3.11	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	4.21	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.55	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	5.00	-1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.81	23.00	-9.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLRYX vs. QCELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the QCELX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRYX and QCELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLRYX	QCELX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	3.11	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.86	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	0.80	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.72	-0.18

Drawdowns

FLRYX vs. QCELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRYX drawdown since its inception was -56.34%, which is greater than QCELX's maximum drawdown of -33.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRYX and QCELX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLRYX	QCELX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.34%	-33.52%	-22.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.04%	-7.92%	-2.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.52%	-18.38%	-9.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.52%	-28.70%	+1.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.73%	-33.52%	-1.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.25%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.49%	-5.66%	-2.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	1.72%	+0.50%

Volatility

FLRYX vs. QCELX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund (FLRYX) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) at 3.06%. This indicates that FLRYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLRYX	QCELX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	3.06%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.78%	9.34%	+0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.74%	12.75%	-0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.04%	18.93%	+0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.54%	18.97%	+0.57%

FLRYX vs. QCELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRYX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than QCELX's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLRYX vs. QCELX - Dividend Comparison

FLRYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, less than QCELX's 12.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLRYX Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund	6.33%	7.03%	12.88%	2.39%	6.74%	17.27%	0.97%	1.34%	4.56%	0.70%	0.62%	0.50%
QCELX AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund	12.19%	14.40%	12.89%	13.67%	11.05%	12.41%	9.94%	5.36%	7.81%	0.99%	1.28%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLRYX and QCELX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FLRYX and QCELX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FLRYX or QCELX?

FLRYX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to QCELX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRYX dropped -56.34% vs QCELX's -33.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.