PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRYX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLRYX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund (FLRYX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRYX achieves a 8.55% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's 9.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLRYX having a 14.14% annualized return and FSKAX not far ahead at 14.44%.


FLRYX

1D
2.29%
1M
0.06%
6M
7.96%
YTD
8.55%
1Y
19.60%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
14.14%
ALL TIME*
10.63%

FSKAX

1D
1.63%
1M
-0.80%
6M
8.19%
YTD
9.87%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
14.44%
ALL TIME*
14.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FLRYX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLRYX
Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund
8.55%15.60%25.36%28.54%-18.45%21.34%12.64%31.30%-7.71%24.95%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
9.87%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRYX and FSKAX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011

0.97

The correlation between FLRYX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLRYX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLRYX
FLRYX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FLRYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLRYX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund (FLRYX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLRYXFSKAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.25

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

2.09

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.25

8.96

-1.71

FLRYX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRYX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLRYX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRYX drawdown since its inception was -56.34%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRYX and FSKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRYXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.34%

-35.01%

-21.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.04%

-8.92%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.52%

-19.43%

-8.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.52%

-25.39%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.73%

-35.01%

+0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-1.97%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.45%

-3.99%

-4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

2.08%

+0.32%

Volatility

FLRYX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund (FLRYX) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 3.43%. This indicates that FLRYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLRYXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

3.43%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

10.33%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.08%

13.21%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.17%

17.52%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.54%

18.45%

+1.09%

FLRYX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRYX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLRYX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

FLRYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than FSKAX's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRYX
Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund
6.48%7.03%12.88%2.39%6.74%17.27%0.97%1.34%4.56%0.70%0.62%0.50%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.95%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FLRYX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLRYX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to FSKAX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRYX dropped -56.34% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

FSKAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLRYX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer