PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLROX vs. DTDRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLROX vs. DTDRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2020™ Retirement Target Fund (FLROX) and Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DTDRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLROX achieves a 5.80% return, which is significantly lower than DTDRX's 11.64% return.


FLROX

1D
0.60%
1M
1.37%
YTD
5.80%
6M
5.88%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
6.53%

DTDRX

1D
0.99%
1M
1.25%
YTD
11.64%
6M
11.32%
1Y
26.82%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLROX vs. DTDRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLROX
Franklin LifeSmart 2020™ Retirement Target Fund
5.80%13.66%8.24%12.71%-15.35%9.94%9.40%0.08%
DTDRX
Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
11.64%19.28%17.13%21.29%-15.25%20.99%13.15%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FLROX and DTDRX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.89

The correlation between FLROX and DTDRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLROX vs. DTDRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLROX
FLROX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FLROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLROX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FLROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLROX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

DTDRX
DTDRX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DTDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DTDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLROX vs. DTDRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2020™ Retirement Target Fund (FLROX) and Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DTDRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLROXDTDRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.45

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

3.44

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.71

14.76

-3.05

FLROX vs. DTDRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLROX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the DTDRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLROX and DTDRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLROX vs. DTDRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLROX drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum DTDRX drawdown of -33.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLROX and DTDRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLROXDTDRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.14%

-33.33%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.63%

-8.57%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.63%

-15.95%

+8.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

-23.47%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.67%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-5.07%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

1.93%

-0.64%

Volatility

FLROX vs. DTDRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LifeSmart 2020™ Retirement Target Fund (FLROX) is 2.76%, while Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DTDRX) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that FLROX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTDRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLROXDTDRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

4.60%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.89%

9.56%

-3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.95%

11.75%

-4.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.92%

14.96%

-5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.02%

19.17%

-10.15%

FLROX vs. DTDRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLROX and DTDRX have an expense ratio of 0.22%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLROX vs. DTDRX - Dividend Comparison

FLROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, more than DTDRX's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTDRX
Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
1.38%1.31%2.07%1.94%2.01%1.53%2.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLROX
Franklin LifeSmart 2020™ Retirement Target Fund
7.17%5.98%3.15%2.74%3.97%9.70%2.21%2.66%3.18%1.49%2.55%3.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLROX and DTDRX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTDRX has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to FLROX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLROX dropped -26.14% vs DTDRX's -33.33%.

DTDRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLROX and DTDRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer