PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRK.L vs. XGSD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLRK.L vs. XGSD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) and Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLRK.L is traded in GBP, while XGSD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XGSD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRK.L achieves a 111.17% return, which is significantly higher than XGSD.L's 12.80% return.


FLRK.L

1D
-5.06%
1M
19.12%
YTD
111.17%
6M
129.46%
1Y
234.17%
3Y*
46.37%
5Y*
20.63%
10Y*

XGSD.L

1D
0.46%
1M
2.73%
YTD
12.80%
6M
14.57%
1Y
33.44%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRK.L vs. XGSD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLRK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
111.17%82.09%-20.56%14.16%-19.37%-5.90%42.60%-14.15%
XGSD.L
Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D
12.80%25.50%9.10%2.81%4.26%14.86%-4.16%6.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRK.L and XGSD.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019

0.49

The correlation between FLRK.L and XGSD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLRK.L vs. XGSD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLRK.L
XGSD.L

Technology

57.4%
1.7%

Industrials

17.7%
9.0%

Financial Services

8.7%
40.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
8.6%

Healthcare

3.0%
1.9%

Basic Materials

2.4%
5.8%

Communication Services

2.3%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
6.1%

Energy

0.9%
9.2%

Utilities

0.4%
6.8%

Real Estate

-

7.2%

Technology

FLRK.L
57.4%
XGSD.L
1.7%

Industrials

FLRK.L
17.7%
XGSD.L
9.0%

Financial Services

FLRK.L
8.7%
XGSD.L
40.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FLRK.L
5.5%
XGSD.L
8.6%

Healthcare

FLRK.L
3.0%
XGSD.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

FLRK.L
2.4%
XGSD.L
5.8%

Communication Services

FLRK.L
2.3%
XGSD.L
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

FLRK.L
1.7%
XGSD.L
6.1%

Energy

FLRK.L
0.9%
XGSD.L
9.2%

Utilities

FLRK.L
0.4%
XGSD.L
6.8%

Real Estate

FLRK.L

-

XGSD.L
7.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLRK.L vs. XGSD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRK.L
FLRK.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLRK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

XGSD.L
XGSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
XGSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRK.L vs. XGSD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) and Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLRK.LXGSD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.85

1.74

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.98

6.99

+3.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

39.30

26.29

+13.01

FLRK.L vs. XGSD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRK.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.24, which is higher than the XGSD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRK.L and XGSD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLRK.LXGSD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.24

3.93

+2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.97

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.32

+0.35

Drawdowns

FLRK.L vs. XGSD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRK.L drawdown since its inception was -41.57%, smaller than the maximum XGSD.L drawdown of -57.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRK.L and XGSD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRK.LXGSD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.57%

-57.01%

+15.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.18%

-4.76%

-16.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.82%

-11.54%

-16.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.68%

-15.37%

-23.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.62%

-0.39%

-5.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.95%

-9.32%

-10.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.93%

1.27%

+4.66%

Volatility

FLRK.L vs. XGSD.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) has a higher volatility of 18.09% compared to Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L) at 2.50%. This indicates that FLRK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGSD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLRK.LXGSD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.09%

2.50%

+15.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.92%

6.35%

+26.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.31%

8.47%

+28.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.31%

11.47%

+13.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.31%

14.26%

+13.05%

FLRK.L vs. XGSD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRK.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XGSD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLRK.L vs. XGSD.L - Dividend Comparison

FLRK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XGSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGSD.L
Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D
4.15%4.60%6.39%7.50%8.70%4.77%5.38%4.26%4.68%3.57%2.76%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLRK.L and XGSD.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLRK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLRK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XGSD.L.

FLRK.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XGSD.L is Global Equity Income. FLRK.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD, while XGSD.L tracks STOXX Global Select Dividend 100. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLRK.L and 0.50% for XGSD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLRK.L and XGSD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer