PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRK.L vs. LYYA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLRK.L vs. LYYA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) and Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLRK.L is traded in GBP, while LYYA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYYA.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRK.L achieves a 107.37% return, which is significantly higher than LYYA.DE's 8.76% return.


FLRK.L

1D
5.54%
1M
7.44%
YTD
107.37%
6M
123.01%
1Y
211.65%
3Y*
44.36%
5Y*
20.31%
10Y*

LYYA.DE

1D
1.66%
1M
1.67%
YTD
8.76%
6M
9.47%
1Y
25.20%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
13.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRK.L vs. LYYA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLRK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
107.37%82.12%-20.55%14.15%-19.37%-5.90%42.60%-14.15%
LYYA.DE
Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist
8.76%13.49%20.53%17.83%-8.94%23.45%11.45%12.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRK.L and LYYA.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019

0.52

The correlation between FLRK.L and LYYA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLRK.L vs. LYYA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRK.L
FLRK.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLRK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

LYYA.DE
LYYA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LYYA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRK.L vs. LYYA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) and Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLRK.LLYYA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.43

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.93

3.84

+6.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

33.67

15.04

+18.63

FLRK.L vs. LYYA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRK.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.42, which is higher than the LYYA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRK.L and LYYA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLRK.L vs. LYYA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRK.L drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than LYYA.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRK.L and LYYA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRK.LLYYA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.58%

-39.15%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.18%

-6.54%

-14.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.37%

-19.70%

-16.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.69%

-19.70%

-18.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.31%

-1.27%

-6.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.90%

-5.25%

-14.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.26%

1.67%

+4.59%

Volatility

FLRK.L vs. LYYA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) has a higher volatility of 17.51% compared to Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE) at 3.15%. This indicates that FLRK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYYA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLRK.LLYYA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.51%

3.15%

+14.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.78%

7.94%

+26.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.80%

10.90%

+27.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.53%

13.75%

+15.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.14%

14.89%

+15.25%

FLRK.L vs. LYYA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRK.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than LYYA.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLRK.L vs. LYYA.DE - Dividend Comparison

FLRK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LYYA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYYA.DE
Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist
1.14%1.26%1.63%1.35%1.95%1.31%1.58%1.49%2.36%2.05%2.33%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLRK.L and LYYA.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLRK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLRK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYYA.DE.

FLRK.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while LYYA.DE is Global Equities. FLRK.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD, while LYYA.DE tracks MSCI World. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLRK.L and 0.30% for LYYA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLRK.L and LYYA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer