FLRK.L vs. HMXJ.L
FLRK.L (Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF) and HMXJ.L (HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - FLRK.L tracks the MSCI Korea NR USD while HMXJ.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLRK.L returned 20.63%/yr vs 6.07%/yr for HMXJ.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLRK.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HMXJ.L.
Performance
FLRK.L vs. HMXJ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FLRK.L is traded in GBP, while HMXJ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HMXJ.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLRK.L achieves a 111.17% return, which is significantly higher than HMXJ.L's 8.91% return.
FLRK.L
- 1D
- -5.06%
- 1M
- 19.12%
- YTD
- 111.17%
- 6M
- 129.46%
- 1Y
- 234.17%
- 3Y*
- 46.37%
- 5Y*
- 20.63%
- 10Y*
- —
HMXJ.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 17.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- 8.45%
FLRK.L vs. HMXJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 111.17% | 82.09% | -20.56% | 14.16% | -19.37% | -5.90% | 42.60% | -14.15% |
HMXJ.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 8.91% | 12.37% | 6.43% | 0.38% | 5.35% | 5.41% | 3.21% | 1.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLRK.L and HMXJ.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019 | 0.58 |
The correlation between FLRK.L and HMXJ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FLRK.L vs. HMXJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLRK.L
HMXJ.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
FLRK.L
HMXJ.L
Industrials
FLRK.L
HMXJ.L
Financial Services
FLRK.L
HMXJ.L
Consumer Cyclical
FLRK.L
HMXJ.L
Healthcare
FLRK.L
HMXJ.L
Basic Materials
FLRK.L
HMXJ.L
Communication Services
FLRK.L
HMXJ.L
Consumer Defensive
FLRK.L
HMXJ.L
Energy
FLRK.L
HMXJ.L
Utilities
FLRK.L
HMXJ.L
Real Estate
FLRK.L
-
HMXJ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLRK.L vs. HMXJ.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLRK.L
HMXJ.L
FLRK.L vs. HMXJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) and HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLRK.L | HMXJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.85 | 1.29 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.98 | 2.46 | +8.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.30 | 7.37 | +31.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLRK.L | HMXJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.24 | 1.61 | +4.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.44 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.42 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
FLRK.L vs. HMXJ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLRK.L drawdown since its inception was -41.57%, which is greater than HMXJ.L's maximum drawdown of -32.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRK.L and HMXJ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLRK.L | HMXJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.57% | -32.30% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.18% | -7.12% | -14.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.82% | -17.47% | -10.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.68% | -17.65% | -21.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.62% | -2.76% | -2.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -6.74% | -13.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.93% | 2.38% | +3.55% |
Volatility
FLRK.L vs. HMXJ.L - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) has a higher volatility of 18.09% compared to HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L) at 3.58%. This indicates that FLRK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMXJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLRK.L | HMXJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.09% | 3.58% | +14.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.92% | 8.32% | +24.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.31% | 10.89% | +26.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.31% | 13.80% | +11.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.31% | 16.12% | +11.19% |
FLRK.L vs. HMXJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLRK.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HMXJ.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLRK.L vs. HMXJ.L - Dividend Comparison
FLRK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HMXJ.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 3.02% | 3.43% | 3.80% | 4.13% | 3.79% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 3.88% | 3.80% | 3.23% | 3.32% | 4.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLRK.L and HMXJ.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLRK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLRK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HMXJ.L.
FLRK.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD, while HMXJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLRK.L and 0.40% for HMXJ.L.
Find the right allocation for FLRK.L and HMXJ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer