FLRK.L vs. FLXC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.L).
FLRK.L and FLXC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLRK.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI Korea NR USD. It was launched on Jun 4, 2019. FLXC.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jun 4, 2019. Both FLRK.L and FLXC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLRK.L vs. FLXC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLRK.L vs. FLXC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 33.25% | 82.09% | -20.56% | 14.16% | -19.37% | -5.90% | 42.60% | 8.49% |
FLXC.L Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -4.31% | 22.74% | 21.44% | -17.10% | -13.73% | -19.73% | 27.37% | 11.38% |
Different Trading Currencies
FLRK.L is traded in GBP, while FLXC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLXC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLRK.L achieves a 33.25% return, which is significantly higher than FLXC.L's -4.31% return.
FLRK.L
- 1D
- 9.23%
- 1M
- -10.91%
- YTD
- 33.25%
- 6M
- 64.38%
- 1Y
- 132.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.26%
- 10Y*
- —
FLXC.L
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- -4.31%
- 6M
- -11.18%
- 1Y
- 4.46%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- -4.07%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLRK.L vs. FLXC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLRK.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXC.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FLRK.L vs. FLXC.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLRK.L
FLXC.L
FLRK.L vs. FLXC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLRK.L | FLXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.25 | 0.21 | +4.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.56 | 0.44 | +4.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.05 | +0.60 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.31 | 0.56 | +5.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.10 | 1.50 | +22.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLRK.L | FLXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.25 | 0.21 | +4.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | -0.13 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.07 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLRK.L and FLXC.L is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FLRK.L vs. FLXC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLRK.L nor FLXC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FLRK.L vs. FLXC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLRK.L drawdown since its inception was -41.57%, smaller than the maximum FLXC.L drawdown of -64.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRK.L and FLXC.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLRK.L | FLXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.57% | -67.90% | +26.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.18% | -15.45% | -5.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.88% | -62.78% | +23.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.91% | -33.36% | +19.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.35% | -31.82% | +11.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.55% | 5.71% | -0.16% |
Volatility
FLRK.L vs. FLXC.L - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) has a higher volatility of 16.59% compared to Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.L) at 6.31%. This indicates that FLRK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLRK.L | FLXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.59% | 6.31% | +10.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.15% | 13.29% | +13.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.15% | 20.80% | +10.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.21% | 31.61% | -8.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.13% | 29.98% | -3.85% |