FLRG.DE vs. FLRA.DE

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

FLRG.DE (Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and FLRA.DE (Franklin Metaverse UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation) are both exchange-traded funds - FLRG.DE is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLRA.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Metaverse Innovation. FLRG.DE is actively managed, while FLRA.DE is passively managed. FLRG.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FLRA.DE.

Performance

FLRG.DE vs. FLRA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Acc (FLRG.DE) and Franklin Metaverse UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLRA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FLRG.DE

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.54%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.38%
• 1Y: 1.31%
• 3Y*: 3.25%
• 5Y*: -2.24%
• 10Y*: —

FLRA.DE

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRG.DE vs. FLRA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FLRG.DE Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Acc	-0.04%
FLRA.DE Franklin Metaverse UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation	2.26%

Return for Risk

FLRG.DE vs. FLRA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRG.DE

FLRG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 15
FLRG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
FLRG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
FLRG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 13
FLRG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FLRG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 17

FLRA.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRG.DE vs. FLRA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Acc (FLRG.DE) and Franklin Metaverse UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLRA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLRG.DE	FLRA.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.49	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.38	—	—

Drawdowns

FLRG.DE vs. FLRA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRG.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.21%, which is greater than FLRA.DE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRG.DE and FLRA.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLRG.DE	FLRA.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.21%	0.00%	-23.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.26%	0.00%	-12.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.45%	0.00%	-10.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLRG.DE	FLRA.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.31%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.07%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.44%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.05%	—	—

FLRG.DE vs. FLRA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRG.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRA.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLRG.DE vs. FLRA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLRG.DE nor FLRA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FLRG.DE or FLRA.DE?

On fees, FLRG.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLRG.DE or FLRA.DE?

FLRG.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FLRA.DE.

What is the main difference between FLRG.DE and FLRA.DE?

FLRG.DE is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while FLRA.DE is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLRG.DE and 0.30% for FLRA.DE.