PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRFX vs. SHRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLRFX vs. SHRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2025 Retirement Target Fund (FLRFX) and ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRFX achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly higher than SHRAX's 2.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLRFX having a 7.56% annualized return and SHRAX not far ahead at 7.85%.


FLRFX

1D
0.27%
1M
1.32%
YTD
6.80%
6M
7.30%
1Y
17.35%
3Y*
13.20%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
7.56%

SHRAX

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.96%
YTD
2.92%
6M
1.03%
1Y
10.22%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRFX vs. SHRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLRFX
Franklin LifeSmart 2025 Retirement Target Fund
6.80%15.05%9.64%13.95%-15.77%11.52%10.39%17.08%-5.21%15.30%
SHRAX
ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund
2.92%13.50%12.02%24.09%-25.43%7.35%19.74%24.26%-7.93%14.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRFX and SHRAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2015

0.84

The correlation between FLRFX and SHRAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLRFX vs. SHRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRFX
FLRFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FLRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SHRAX
SHRAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SHRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SHRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRFX vs. SHRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2025 Retirement Target Fund (FLRFX) and ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLRFXSHRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.11

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

0.70

+2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.30

1.97

+10.33

FLRFX vs. SHRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the SHRAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRFX and SHRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLRFXSHRAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

0.60

+1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.16

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.38

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.46

+0.18

Drawdowns

FLRFX vs. SHRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRFX drawdown since its inception was -28.66%, smaller than the maximum SHRAX drawdown of -57.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRFX and SHRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRFXSHRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.66%

-57.26%

+28.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.21%

-14.59%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.01%

-23.73%

+14.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.66%

-33.77%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.66%

-33.77%

+5.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-2.09%

+1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-11.27%

+5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

5.17%

-3.77%

Volatility

FLRFX vs. SHRAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LifeSmart 2025 Retirement Target Fund (FLRFX) is 2.41%, while ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that FLRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLRFXSHRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

4.22%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.21%

13.14%

-6.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.56%

17.10%

-9.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.55%

20.88%

-9.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.51%

20.89%

-10.38%

FLRFX vs. SHRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRFX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRAX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLRFX vs. SHRAX - Dividend Comparison

FLRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, less than SHRAX's 21.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRFX
Franklin LifeSmart 2025 Retirement Target Fund
8.18%8.74%3.61%2.88%4.16%12.42%3.47%3.82%6.82%2.02%2.68%6.18%
SHRAX
ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund
21.64%22.27%20.39%13.77%15.63%26.11%18.42%12.71%18.97%5.97%4.76%4.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLRFX and SHRAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHRAX has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to FLRFX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRFX dropped -28.66% vs SHRAX's -57.26%.

FLRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLRFX and SHRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer