FLRA.DE vs. LSMC.DE
FLRA.DE (Franklin Metaverse UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLRA.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Metaverse Innovation, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLRA.DE returned 26.58%/yr vs 62.06%/yr for LSMC.DE. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLRA.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
FLRA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLRA.DE achieves a 19.68% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return.
FLRA.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 16.33%
- YTD
- 19.68%
- 6M
- 14.77%
- 1Y
- 38.95%
- 3Y*
- 26.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 16.45%
- YTD
- 63.83%
- 6M
- 64.57%
- 1Y
- 130.64%
- 3Y*
- 62.06%
- 5Y*
- 36.20%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
FLRA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRA.DE Franklin Metaverse UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation | 19.68% | 5.59% | 27.26% | 71.63% | -21.53% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.83% | 32.60% | 66.54% | 74.46% | -7.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLRA.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FLRA.DE and LSMC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLRA.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FLRA.DE
LSMC.DE
FLRA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Metaverse UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLRA.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLRA.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.59 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 10.37 | -9.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.01 | 32.83 | -29.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLRA.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 4.27 | -2.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.82 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
FLRA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLRA.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.22%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRA.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLRA.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.22% | -39.77% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.17% | -12.53% | -16.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.22% | -36.22% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | -3.34% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -9.37% | -0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.91% | 3.96% | +8.95% |
Volatility
FLRA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Metaverse UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLRA.DE) is 8.80%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that FLRA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLRA.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.80% | 11.23% | -2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.60% | 22.18% | -3.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.70% | 30.40% | -4.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 31.21% | -3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 26.06% | +1.67% |
FLRA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLRA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLRA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLRA.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLRA.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLRA.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLRA.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
FLRA.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. FLRA.DE tracks Solactive Global Metaverse Innovation, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FLRA.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for FLRA.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer