FLQA.L vs. IDTW.L
FLQA.L (Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IDTW.L (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - FLQA.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Linked FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China Index - Net Return, while IDTW.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Index (Net) (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLQA.L returned 12.23%/yr vs 18.84%/yr for IDTW.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLQA.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IDTW.L.
Performance
FLQA.L vs. IDTW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLQA.L achieves a 30.17% return, which is significantly lower than IDTW.L's 51.77% return.
FLQA.L
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -11.56%
- 6M
- 22.63%
- YTD
- 30.17%
- 1Y
- 48.05%
- 3Y*
- 24.43%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- —
IDTW.L
- 1D
- -3.99%
- 1M
- -10.58%
- 6M
- 42.72%
- YTD
- 51.77%
- 1Y
- 73.35%
- 3Y*
- 37.69%
- 5Y*
- 18.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.92%
FLQA.L vs. IDTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQA.L Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.17% | 29.84% | 7.76% | 12.02% | -12.93% | 4.57% | 6.71% | 9.75% | -5.84% |
IDTW.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 51.77% | 31.78% | 23.61% | 28.84% | -29.55% | 28.51% | 34.35% | 34.44% | -12.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLQA.L and IDTW.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between FLQA.L and IDTW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLQA.L vs. IDTW.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLQA.L
IDTW.L
FLQA.L vs. IDTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLQA.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLQA.L | IDTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 5.05 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.76 | 16.48 | -5.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLQA.L vs. IDTW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLQA.L drawdown since its inception was -29.21%, smaller than the maximum IDTW.L drawdown of -60.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQA.L and IDTW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLQA.L | IDTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.21% | -60.07% | +30.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.19% | -14.46% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.19% | -28.24% | +6.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.38% | -40.98% | +15.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.19% | -14.46% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -12.59% | +5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 4.44% | +0.01% |
Volatility
FLQA.L vs. IDTW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLQA.L) is 10.89%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L) has a volatility of 12.06%. This indicates that FLQA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLQA.L | IDTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.89% | 12.06% | -1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.07% | 24.76% | -1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.18% | 28.27% | -3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 23.97% | -6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 22.41% | -3.88% |
FLQA.L vs. IDTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLQA.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IDTW.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLQA.L vs. IDTW.L - Dividend Comparison
FLQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDTW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQA.L Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDTW.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.99% | 1.51% | 1.43% | 2.09% | 3.39% | 1.35% | 1.73% | 2.15% | 2.78% | 2.70% | 3.10% | 3.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLQA.L and IDTW.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLQA.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLQA.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDTW.L.
FLQA.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IDTW.L is Technology Equities. FLQA.L tracks Linked FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China Index - Net Return, while IDTW.L tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Index (Net) (USD). They also come from different issuers: Franklin and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for FLQA.L and 0.74% for IDTW.L.
Find the right allocation for FLQA.L and IDTW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer