FLQA.L vs. CA3S.L
FLQA.L (Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF) and CA3S.L (Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) are both China Equities funds - FLQA.L tracks the Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF while CA3S.L tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLQA.L returned 25.15%/yr vs 15.52%/yr for CA3S.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLQA.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CA3S.L.
Performance
FLQA.L vs. CA3S.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FLQA.L is traded in USD, while CA3S.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CA3S.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLQA.L achieves a 32.52% return, which is significantly higher than CA3S.L's 12.04% return.
FLQA.L
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -9.13%
- 6M
- 26.58%
- YTD
- 32.52%
- 1Y
- 52.26%
- 3Y*
- 25.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- —
CA3S.L
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 38.19%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLQA.L vs. CA3S.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQA.L Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF | 32.52% | 29.84% | 7.76% | 12.02% | -7.70% |
CA3S.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 12.04% | 34.07% | 14.71% | -12.23% | 7,752.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLQA.L and CA3S.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLQA.L vs. CA3S.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLQA.L
CA3S.L
FLQA.L vs. CA3S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FLQA.L) and Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (CA3S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLQA.L | CA3S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -135.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 63.06 | -61.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 0.38 | +3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.86 | 1.49 | +10.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLQA.L vs. CA3S.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLQA.L drawdown since its inception was -29.21%, smaller than the maximum CA3S.L drawdown of -99.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQA.L and CA3S.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLQA.L | CA3S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.21% | -99.22% | +70.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.77% | -99.22% | +85.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.19% | -99.22% | +77.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.64% | -13.56% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -17.63% | +10.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.36% | 25.52% | -21.16% |
Volatility
FLQA.L vs. CA3S.L - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FLQA.L) has a higher volatility of 11.18% compared to Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (CA3S.L) at 9.26%. This indicates that FLQA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CA3S.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLQA.L | CA3S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.18% | 9.26% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.99% | 923.43% | -900.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.11% | 13,935.14% | -13,910.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 7,838.80% | -7,821.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 7,838.80% | -7,820.28% |
FLQA.L vs. CA3S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLQA.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CA3S.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLQA.L vs. CA3S.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLQA.L nor CA3S.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLQA.L and CA3S.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLQA.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLQA.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CA3S.L.
FLQA.L tracks Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF, while CA3S.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for FLQA.L and 0.35% for CA3S.L.
Find the right allocation for FLQA.L and CA3S.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer