FLPE.L vs. PACW.L
FLPE.L (Northern Trust Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and PACW.L (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income) are both Global Equities funds - FLPE.L tracks the MSCI World IMI Listed Private Equity Select (USD Net Total Return) Index while PACW.L tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLPE.L returned -17.64% vs 22.47% for PACW.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLPE.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PACW.L.
Performance
FLPE.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLPE.L achieves a -13.52% return, which is significantly lower than PACW.L's 10.95% return.
FLPE.L
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- -16.48%
- YTD
- -13.52%
- 1Y
- -17.64%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PACW.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- 8.28%
- YTD
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLPE.L vs. PACW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLPE.L Northern Trust Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -13.52% | -6.55% |
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income | 10.95% | 9.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLPE.L and PACW.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2025 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FLPE.L and PACW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLPE.L vs. PACW.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLPE.L
PACW.L
FLPE.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLPE.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLPE.L | PACW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.38 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 3.20 | -3.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 12.37 | -13.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLPE.L vs. PACW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLPE.L drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, which is greater than PACW.L's maximum drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLPE.L and PACW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLPE.L | PACW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.46% | -17.74% | -25.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.35% | -7.06% | -21.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.17% | -2.16% | -19.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.81% | -2.91% | -17.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.30% | 1.82% | +13.48% |
Volatility
FLPE.L vs. PACW.L - Volatility Comparison
Northern Trust Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLPE.L) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) at 3.15%. This indicates that FLPE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PACW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLPE.L | PACW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 3.15% | +2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.69% | 8.64% | +9.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.57% | 11.23% | +10.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.09% | 13.89% | +12.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.09% | 13.89% | +12.20% |
FLPE.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLPE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLPE.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison
FLPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
FLPE.L Northern Trust Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% |
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLPE.L and PACW.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FLPE.L.
FLPE.L tracks MSCI World IMI Listed Private Equity Select (USD Net Total Return) Index, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FLPE.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.
Find the right allocation for FLPE.L and PACW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer