PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLPE.L vs. IWVL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLPE.L vs. IWVL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Northern Trust Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLPE.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLPE.L is traded in GBP, while IWVL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWVL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLPE.L achieves a -13.52% return, which is significantly lower than IWVL.L's 27.62% return.


FLPE.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.53%
6M
-16.48%
YTD
-13.52%
1Y
-17.64%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
10Y*

IWVL.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
-6.17%
6M
22.45%
YTD
27.62%
1Y
53.77%
3Y*
24.23%
5Y*
16.68%
10Y*
12.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLPE.L vs. IWVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FLPE.L
Northern Trust Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-13.52%-1.74%31.38%35.15%-37.39%
IWVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
27.62%30.42%6.96%13.56%1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FLPE.L and IWVL.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022

0.65

The correlation between FLPE.L and IWVL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLPE.L vs. IWVL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLPE.L
FLPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FLPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FLPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

IWVL.L
IWVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IWVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLPE.L vs. IWVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLPE.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLPE.LIWVL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.59

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

6.84

-7.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.15

23.54

-24.69

FLPE.L vs. IWVL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLPE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the IWVL.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLPE.L and IWVL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLPE.L vs. IWVL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLPE.L drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, which is greater than IWVL.L's maximum drawdown of -28.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLPE.L and IWVL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLPE.LIWVL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.46%

-28.56%

-14.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.35%

-7.82%

-20.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.16%

-14.14%

-16.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.17%

-7.04%

-14.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.81%

-4.50%

-16.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.30%

2.28%

+13.02%

Volatility

FLPE.L vs. IWVL.L - Volatility Comparison

Northern Trust Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLPE.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) have volatilities of 5.99% and 6.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLPE.LIWVL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

6.12%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.69%

14.59%

+3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.57%

16.43%

+5.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.09%

14.66%

+11.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.09%

16.10%

+9.99%

FLPE.L vs. IWVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLPE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IWVL.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLPE.L vs. IWVL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLPE.L nor IWVL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FLPE.L and IWVL.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWVL.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWVL.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FLPE.L.

FLPE.L tracks MSCI World IMI Listed Private Equity Select (USD Net Total Return) Index, while IWVL.L tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FLPE.L and 0.25% for IWVL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLPE.L and IWVL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer