PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLPE.L vs. INFR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLPE.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Northern Trust Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLPE.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLPE.L is traded in GBP, while INFR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INFR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLPE.L achieves a -13.52% return, which is significantly lower than INFR.L's 14.16% return.


FLPE.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.53%
6M
-16.48%
YTD
-13.52%
1Y
-17.64%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
10Y*

INFR.L

1D
0.98%
1M
3.34%
6M
12.26%
YTD
14.16%
1Y
18.82%
3Y*
11.52%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
7.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLPE.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FLPE.L
Northern Trust Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-13.52%-1.74%31.38%35.15%-37.39%
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
14.16%5.13%10.76%-5.53%10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FLPE.L and INFR.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022

0.29

The correlation between FLPE.L and INFR.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLPE.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLPE.L
FLPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FLPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FLPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

INFR.L
INFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
INFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
INFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLPE.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLPE.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLPE.LINFR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.29

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

3.61

-4.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.15

8.54

-9.69

FLPE.L vs. INFR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLPE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the INFR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLPE.L and INFR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLPE.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLPE.L drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -64.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLPE.L and INFR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLPE.LINFR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.46%

-64.87%

+21.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.35%

-5.19%

-23.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.16%

-11.19%

-18.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.17%

-0.50%

-20.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.81%

-24.36%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.30%

2.20%

+13.10%

Volatility

FLPE.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison

Northern Trust Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLPE.L) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) at 3.35%. This indicates that FLPE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLPE.LINFR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

3.35%

+2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.69%

9.08%

+8.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.57%

10.99%

+10.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.09%

12.32%

+13.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.09%

13.96%

+12.13%

FLPE.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLPE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLPE.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison

FLPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLPE.L
Northern Trust Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.01%2.25%2.32%2.43%2.05%1.89%2.21%2.15%2.27%2.72%2.57%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLPE.L and INFR.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLPE.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLPE.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.

FLPE.L is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. FLPE.L tracks MSCI World IMI Listed Private Equity Select (USD Net Total Return) Index, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FLPE.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLPE.L and INFR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer