FLOT.L vs. CBU7.L
FLOT.L (iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and CBU7.L (iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - FLOT.L is a Ultra Short-Term Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note <5 Years Index, while CBU7.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLOT.L returned 4.33%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for CBU7.L. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. FLOT.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CBU7.L.
Performance
FLOT.L vs. CBU7.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLOT.L achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than CBU7.L's -0.48% return.
FLOT.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- 5.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- —
CBU7.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 3.85%
- 5Y*
- 0.34%
- 10Y*
- 1.32%
FLOT.L vs. CBU7.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOT.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.38% | 5.19% | 6.39% | 6.04% | 1.87% | 0.60% | 0.60% | 4.19% | 1.39% | 0.87% |
CBU7.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc | -0.48% | 7.34% | 2.18% | 4.24% | -9.35% | -2.35% | 6.98% | 6.06% | 1.21% | -0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLOT.L and CBU7.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2017 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLOT.L vs. CBU7.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLOT.L
CBU7.L
FLOT.L vs. CBU7.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLOT.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBU7.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLOT.L | CBU7.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.18 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.83 | 1.13 | +22.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 44.39 | 3.01 | +41.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLOT.L vs. CBU7.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLOT.L drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, roughly equal to the maximum CBU7.L drawdown of -14.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOT.L and CBU7.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLOT.L | CBU7.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -14.18% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.20% | -2.50% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.53% | -3.66% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.53% | -13.55% | +11.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.56% | +1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -2.90% | +2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.11% | 0.94% | -0.83% |
Volatility
FLOT.L vs. CBU7.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLOT.L) is 0.64%, while iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBU7.L) has a volatility of 0.78%. This indicates that FLOT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBU7.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLOT.L | CBU7.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | 0.78% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.46% | 2.21% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94% | 2.88% | -0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.90% | 4.73% | -1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.92% | 4.11% | -0.19% |
FLOT.L vs. CBU7.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLOT.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than CBU7.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLOT.L vs. CBU7.L - Dividend Comparison
FLOT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, while CBU7.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBU7.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLOT.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.68% | 5.02% | 6.05% | 5.50% | 1.45% | 0.60% | 1.59% | 2.91% | 2.21% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLOT.L and CBU7.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBU7.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBU7.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for FLOT.L.
FLOT.L is categorized as Ultra Short-Term Bonds, while CBU7.L is Government Bonds. FLOT.L tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note <5 Years Index, while CBU7.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for FLOT.L and 0.07% for CBU7.L.
Find the right allocation for FLOT.L and CBU7.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer