FLOT.AX vs. HBRD.AX
FLOT.AX (VanEck Australian Floating Rate ETF) and HBRD.AX (Betashares Australian Credit Income Active ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. FLOT.AX is passively managed, while HBRD.AX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLOT.AX returned 3.38%/yr vs 3.90%/yr for HBRD.AX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLOT.AX vs. HBRD.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLOT.AX achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly higher than HBRD.AX's 1.65% return.
FLOT.AX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 3.57%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- —
HBRD.AX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.90%
- 10Y*
- —
FLOT.AX vs. HBRD.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOT.AX VanEck Australian Floating Rate ETF | 1.78% | 4.53% | 5.19% | 4.66% | 0.94% | 0.16% | 1.67% | 2.58% | 1.95% | 0.16% |
HBRD.AX Betashares Australian Credit Income Active ETF | 1.65% | 4.39% | 6.15% | 3.70% | 1.71% | 4.14% | 2.74% | 5.71% | 2.20% | 1.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLOT.AX and HBRD.AX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2017 | 0.03 |
The correlation between FLOT.AX and HBRD.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLOT.AX vs. HBRD.AX — Risk / Return Rank
FLOT.AX
HBRD.AX
FLOT.AX vs. HBRD.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Australian Floating Rate ETF (FLOT.AX) and Betashares Australian Credit Income Active ETF (HBRD.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLOT.AX | HBRD.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.54 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.10 | 5.43 | +1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.26 | 15.99 | +3.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLOT.AX vs. HBRD.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLOT.AX drawdown since its inception was -9.44%, smaller than the maximum HBRD.AX drawdown of -15.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOT.AX and HBRD.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLOT.AX | HBRD.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -15.60% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.48% | -0.69% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.84% | -1.02% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.36% | -4.65% | +3.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -0.51% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.18% | 0.24% | -0.06% |
Volatility
FLOT.AX vs. HBRD.AX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Australian Floating Rate ETF (FLOT.AX) is 0.30%, while Betashares Australian Credit Income Active ETF (HBRD.AX) has a volatility of 0.33%. This indicates that FLOT.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBRD.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLOT.AX | HBRD.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.30% | 0.33% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.08% | 1.21% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44% | 1.68% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.41% | 2.29% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.16% | 4.34% | -1.18% |
Dividends
FLOT.AX vs. HBRD.AX - Dividend Comparison
FLOT.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than HBRD.AX's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOT.AX VanEck Australian Floating Rate ETF | 3.38% | 4.30% | 4.56% | 4.30% | 1.53% | 0.92% | 1.33% | 2.47% | 2.02% | 1.20% |
HBRD.AX Betashares Australian Credit Income Active ETF | 4.07% | 4.98% | 4.85% | 4.78% | 2.83% | 2.48% | 2.85% | 3.45% | 3.56% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLOT.AX and HBRD.AX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and BetaShares.
Find the right allocation for FLOT.AX and HBRD.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer