FLOS.L vs. IITU.L
FLOS.L (iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - FLOS.L is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist), while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLOS.L returned 4.01%/yr vs 21.55%/yr for IITU.L. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLOS.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
FLOS.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLOS.L achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 16.77% return.
FLOS.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 4.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- —
IITU.L
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -3.41%
- 6M
- 19.28%
- YTD
- 16.77%
- 1Y
- 30.62%
- 3Y*
- 28.08%
- 5Y*
- 21.55%
- 10Y*
- 25.26%
FLOS.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOS.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 2.36% | 4.78% | 6.24% | 6.00% | 0.83% | 0.10% | 0.18% | 2.42% | -0.45% | 0.28% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 16.77% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 6.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLOS.L and IITU.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2017 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLOS.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLOS.L
IITU.L
FLOS.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (FLOS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLOS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.00 | 1.25 | +0.76 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.76 | 1.82 | +13.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 79.94 | 4.40 | +75.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLOS.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLOS.L drawdown since its inception was -14.78%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -41.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOS.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLOS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.78% | -41.09% | +26.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.29% | -16.76% | +16.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.46% | -28.03% | +26.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.13% | -28.03% | +25.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -8.00% | +7.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.25% | -8.09% | +7.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 6.94% | -6.88% |
Volatility
FLOS.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (FLOS.L) is 0.22%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.43%. This indicates that FLOS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLOS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.22% | 7.43% | -7.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.80% | 16.54% | -15.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07% | 21.54% | -20.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.68% | 26.39% | -24.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.36% | 23.71% | -20.35% |
FLOS.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLOS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLOS.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
FLOS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, while IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOS.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 4.68% | 5.02% | 5.93% | 5.46% | 1.50% | 0.57% | 1.62% | 2.95% | 2.27% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLOS.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLOS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLOS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IITU.L.
FLOS.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. FLOS.L tracks iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist), while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FLOS.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for FLOS.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer