FLOS.L vs. CSP1.L
FLOS.L (iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLOS.L is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist), while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLOS.L returned 4.01%/yr vs 13.53%/yr for CSP1.L. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLOS.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.
Performance
FLOS.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLOS.L achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's 10.00% return.
FLOS.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 4.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- —
CSP1.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 20.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.53%
- 10Y*
- 14.69%
FLOS.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOS.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 2.36% | 4.78% | 6.24% | 6.00% | 0.83% | 0.10% | 0.18% | 2.42% | -0.45% | 0.28% |
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.00% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 31.07% | 13.65% | 26.42% | 0.01% | 5.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLOS.L and CSP1.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2017 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLOS.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLOS.L
CSP1.L
FLOS.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (FLOS.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLOS.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.00 | 1.34 | +0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.76 | 2.91 | +12.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 79.94 | 10.45 | +69.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLOS.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLOS.L drawdown since its inception was -14.78%, smaller than the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOS.L and CSP1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLOS.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.78% | -25.48% | +10.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.29% | -7.12% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.46% | -20.77% | +19.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.13% | -20.77% | +18.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -1.06% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.25% | -3.64% | +3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 1.99% | -1.93% |
Volatility
FLOS.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (FLOS.L) is 0.22%, while iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that FLOS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLOS.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.22% | 2.87% | -2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.80% | 7.83% | -7.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07% | 11.08% | -10.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.68% | 20.05% | -18.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.36% | 18.33% | -14.97% |
FLOS.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLOS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLOS.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
FLOS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, while CSP1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLOS.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 4.68% | 5.02% | 5.93% | 5.46% | 1.50% | 0.57% | 1.62% | 2.95% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLOS.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for FLOS.L.
FLOS.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. FLOS.L tracks iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist), while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FLOS.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.
Find the right allocation for FLOS.L and CSP1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer