PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLOA.L vs. VAGE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLOA.L vs. VAGE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (VAGE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLOA.L is traded in USD, while VAGE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VAGE.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLOA.L achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly higher than VAGE.DE's -1.72% return.


FLOA.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.46%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.24%
1Y
5.02%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*

VAGE.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
-1.72%
6M
-0.85%
1Y
2.95%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
-2.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLOA.L vs. VAGE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLOA.L
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.04%4.98%6.42%6.62%1.35%0.42%0.86%1.58%
VAGE.DE
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist
-1.72%16.57%-5.03%7.79%-19.44%-10.47%15.10%-0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FLOA.L and VAGE.DE is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2019

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLOA.L vs. VAGE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLOA.L
FLOA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLOA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

VAGE.DE
VAGE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
VAGE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLOA.L vs. VAGE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (VAGE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLOA.LVAGE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.07

1.07

+1.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.50

0.49

+10.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

55.93

1.20

+54.73

FLOA.L vs. VAGE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOA.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.02, which is higher than the VAGE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOA.L and VAGE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLOA.LVAGE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.02

0.36

+3.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.16

-0.26

+2.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

-0.05

+0.84

Drawdowns

FLOA.L vs. VAGE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOA.L drawdown since its inception was -14.96%, smaller than the maximum VAGE.DE drawdown of -36.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOA.L and VAGE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLOA.LVAGE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.96%

-36.01%

+21.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.48%

-5.94%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.74%

-11.22%

+9.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.53%

-33.82%

+31.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-15.43%

+15.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-15.59%

+15.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.09%

2.46%

-2.37%

Volatility

FLOA.L vs. VAGE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) is 0.49%, while Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (VAGE.DE) has a volatility of 2.33%. This indicates that FLOA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAGE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLOA.LVAGE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.49%

2.33%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.13%

5.81%

-4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24%

8.14%

-6.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.98%

9.76%

-7.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.27%

9.28%

-5.01%

FLOA.L vs. VAGE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLOA.L and VAGE.DE have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLOA.L vs. VAGE.DE - Dividend Comparison

FLOA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VAGE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FLOA.L
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VAGE.DE
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist
3.60%3.51%3.13%2.39%1.47%0.87%1.20%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLOA.L and VAGE.DE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLOA.L and VAGE.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

FLOA.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VAGE.DE is Global Bonds. FLOA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while VAGE.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted and Scaled (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLOA.L and VAGE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer