FLOA.L vs. SUSD.L
FLOA.L (iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SUSD.L (SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - FLOA.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD while SUSD.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLOA.L returned 4.28%/yr vs 2.94%/yr for SUSD.L. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLOA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SUSD.L.
Performance
FLOA.L vs. SUSD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FLOA.L is traded in USD, while SUSD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SUSD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLOA.L achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly higher than SUSD.L's 1.09% return.
FLOA.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- 5.73%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- —
SUSD.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 2.61%
FLOA.L vs. SUSD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOA.L iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.04% | 4.98% | 6.42% | 6.62% | 1.35% | 0.42% | 0.86% | 4.17% | 0.86% |
SUSD.L SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 1.09% | 5.73% | 5.39% | 4.79% | -2.05% | 0.19% | 2.66% | 5.40% | 1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLOA.L and SUSD.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2018 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLOA.L vs. SUSD.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLOA.L
SUSD.L
FLOA.L vs. SUSD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUSD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLOA.L | SUSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.07 | 1.19 | +0.88 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.50 | 3.60 | +6.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 55.93 | 12.75 | +43.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLOA.L | SUSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02 | 1.05 | +2.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.16 | 0.59 | +1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.46 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
FLOA.L vs. SUSD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLOA.L drawdown since its inception was -14.96%, which is greater than SUSD.L's maximum drawdown of -8.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOA.L and SUSD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLOA.L | SUSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.96% | -8.01% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.48% | -1.22% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.74% | -2.07% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.53% | -5.41% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.57% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -0.84% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.09% | 0.35% | -0.26% |
Volatility
FLOA.L vs. SUSD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) is 0.49%, while SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUSD.L) has a volatility of 1.75%. This indicates that FLOA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUSD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLOA.L | SUSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | 1.75% | -1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.13% | 3.48% | -2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24% | 4.19% | -2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.98% | 5.03% | -3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.27% | 5.26% | -0.99% |
FLOA.L vs. SUSD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLOA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SUSD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLOA.L vs. SUSD.L - Dividend Comparison
FLOA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SUSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOA.L iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUSD.L SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 4.60% | 4.91% | 4.20% | 3.11% | 1.14% | 1.80% | 2.77% | 2.57% | 1.66% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLOA.L and SUSD.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLOA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLOA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SUSD.L.
FLOA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while SUSD.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for FLOA.L and 0.12% for SUSD.L.
Find the right allocation for FLOA.L and SUSD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer