FLOA.L vs. ROLG.L
FLOA.L (iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ROLG.L (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - FLOA.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while ROLG.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLOA.L returned 4.34%/yr vs 12.60%/yr for ROLG.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLOA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for ROLG.L.
Performance
FLOA.L vs. ROLG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FLOA.L is traded in USD, while ROLG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ROLG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLOA.L achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than ROLG.L's 23.84% return.
FLOA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- 5.58%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- —
ROLG.L
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 16.70%
- YTD
- 23.84%
- 1Y
- 34.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.60%
- 10Y*
- —
FLOA.L vs. ROLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOA.L iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.49% | 4.89% | 6.42% | 6.65% | 1.35% | 0.42% | 0.86% | 4.17% | -0.54% |
ROLG.L iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD | 23.84% | 16.86% | 4.55% | -2.47% | 16.56% | 28.06% | 0.58% | 5.92% | -31.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLOA.L and ROLG.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLOA.L vs. ROLG.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLOA.L
ROLG.L
FLOA.L vs. ROLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLOA.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.92 | 1.36 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.31 | 2.51 | +7.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 42.95 | 8.64 | +34.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLOA.L vs. ROLG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLOA.L drawdown since its inception was -14.96%, smaller than the maximum ROLG.L drawdown of -47.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOA.L and ROLG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLOA.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.96% | -47.02% | +32.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.46% | -13.82% | +13.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.77% | -22.26% | +20.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.53% | -22.26% | +19.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -7.54% | +7.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -17.69% | +17.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.11% | 4.02% | -3.91% |
Volatility
FLOA.L vs. ROLG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) is 0.44%, while iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that FLOA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLOA.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | 4.65% | -4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.33% | 14.35% | -13.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64% | 16.44% | -14.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.11% | 22.44% | -20.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.27% | 22.15% | -17.88% |
FLOA.L vs. ROLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLOA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ROLG.L's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLOA.L vs. ROLG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLOA.L nor ROLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLOA.L and ROLG.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLOA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLOA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for ROLG.L.
FLOA.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ROLG.L is Commodities. FLOA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while ROLG.L tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for FLOA.L and 0.28% for ROLG.L.
Find the right allocation for FLOA.L and ROLG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer