PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLMI vs. CA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLMI vs. CA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLMI vs. CA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLMI achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than CA's -0.08% return.


FLMI

1D
0.28%
1M
-2.31%
YTD
0.28%
6M
1.94%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*

CA

1D
0.38%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
1.22%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLMI vs. CA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLMI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CA's 0.07% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLMI vs. CA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLMI
FLMI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FLMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLMI Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FLMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

CA
CA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
CA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLMI vs. CA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLMICADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

0.89

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

1.17

+0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.21

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

1.17

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.10

3.35

+1.76

FLMI vs. CA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the CA Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLMI and CA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLMICADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

0.89

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.57

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between FLMI and CA is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLMI vs. CA - Dividend Comparison

FLMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than CA's 3.20% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLMI
Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF
3.93%3.89%4.08%3.71%3.08%2.22%2.09%2.71%2.41%0.34%
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
3.20%3.14%3.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLMI vs. CA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLMI drawdown since its inception was -14.66%, which is greater than CA's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMI and CA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLMICADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.66%

-5.24%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.19%

-3.67%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-2.00%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-1.30%

-1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

1.28%

-0.14%

Volatility

FLMI vs. CA - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA) at 1.31%. This indicates that FLMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLMICADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

1.31%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.99%

1.78%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.52%

4.40%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.43%

4.09%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.75%

4.09%

+0.66%