FLIN vs. RAYS
FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) and RAYS (Global X Solar ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLIN is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while RAYS is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Solar Index. Both are passively managed. FLIN charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RAYS.
Performance
FLIN vs. RAYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FLIN
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -10.29%
- 6M
- -8.41%
- 1Y
- -11.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
RAYS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLIN vs. RAYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -8.41% |
RAYS Global X Solar ETF | 0.00% |
FLIN vs. RAYS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLIN
RAYS
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FLIN
RAYS
-
Consumer Cyclical
FLIN
RAYS
Industrials
FLIN
RAYS
Energy
FLIN
RAYS
-
Basic Materials
FLIN
RAYS
Technology
FLIN
RAYS
Healthcare
FLIN
RAYS
-
Consumer Defensive
FLIN
RAYS
-
Utilities
FLIN
RAYS
Communication Services
FLIN
RAYS
-
Real Estate
FLIN
RAYS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLIN vs. RAYS — Risk / Return Rank
FLIN
RAYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLIN vs. RAYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) and Global X Solar ETF (RAYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLIN | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLIN vs. RAYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLIN drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, which is greater than RAYS's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIN and RAYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLIN | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.90% | 0.00% | -41.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.41% | 0.00% | -17.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.04% | 0.00% | -8.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.93% | — | — |
Volatility
FLIN vs. RAYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLIN | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 0.00% | +15.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 0.00% | +15.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 0.00% | +20.43% |
FLIN vs. RAYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLIN has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RAYS's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLIN vs. RAYS - Dividend Comparison
FLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while RAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.62% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% |
RAYS Global X Solar ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, FLIN is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLIN is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RAYS.
FLIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for RAYS.
FLIN is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while RAYS is Alternative Energy Equities. FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while RAYS tracks Solactive Solar Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLIN and 0.50% for RAYS.
Find the right allocation for FLIN and RAYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer