FLIN vs. DGIN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) and DGIN (VanEck Digital India ETF) are both India Equities funds - FLIN tracks the FTSE India RIC Capped Index while DGIN tracks the MVIS Digital India. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLIN returned 5.63%/yr vs 5.17%/yr for DGIN. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FLIN charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for DGIN.

Performance

FLIN vs. DGIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) and VanEck Digital India ETF (DGIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLIN achieves a -6.92% return, which is significantly higher than DGIN's -10.31% return.

FLIN

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 0.73%
• 6M: -5.45%
• YTD: -6.92%
• 1Y: -4.62%
• 3Y*: 5.63%
• 5Y*: 4.41%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.89%

DGIN

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 3.14%
• 6M: -7.57%
• YTD: -10.31%
• 1Y: -8.82%
• 3Y*: 5.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DGIN VanEck Digital India ETF	$46.11K	$62.27K	$106.60K
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	$24.21M	$28.81M	$28.13M

FLIN vs. DGIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	-6.92%	2.40%	10.33%	20.58%	-6.49%
DGIN VanEck Digital India ETF	-10.31%	-6.00%	22.56%	30.30%	-22.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FLIN and DGIN is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2022	0.84

The correlation between FLIN and DGIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLIN vs. DGIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLIN	DGIN
Financial Services	27.5%	22.3%
Consumer Cyclical	12.1%	20.0%
Industrials	11.3%	1.0%
Basic Materials	9.2%	-
Energy	8.1%	8.1%
Technology	8.0%	20.6%
Healthcare	7.2%	0.9%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	-
Utilities	4.9%	-
Communication Services	4.7%	28.1%
Real Estate	1.5%	-

Return for Risk

FLIN vs. DGIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLIN

FLIN Risk / Return Rank: 7
FLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
FLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
FLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

DGIN

DGIN Risk / Return Rank: 6
DGIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
DGIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
DGIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5
DGIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
DGIN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLIN vs. DGIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) and VanEck Digital India ETF (DGIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLIN	DGIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.30	-0.46	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.33	-0.55	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	0.94	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.25	-0.31	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.57	-0.64	+0.07

FLIN vs. DGIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is higher than the DGIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLIN and DGIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLIN vs. DGIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLIN drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, which is greater than DGIN's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIN and DGIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLIN	DGIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.90%	-33.65%	-8.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.25%	-28.59%	+10.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.85%	-33.65%	+10.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.31%	-19.63%	+5.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.16%	-13.64%	+5.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.19%	13.90%	-5.71%

Volatility

FLIN vs. DGIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) is 4.09%, while VanEck Digital India ETF (DGIN) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that FLIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLIN	DGIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.09%	5.22%	-1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.22%	16.03%	-2.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.41%	19.08%	-3.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.81%	18.87%	-3.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.35%	18.87%	+1.48%

FLIN vs. DGIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLIN has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DGIN's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLIN vs. DGIN - Dividend Comparison

FLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than DGIN's 2.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DGIN VanEck Digital India ETF	2.12%	1.90%	0.00%	0.24%	0.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	0.42%	0.56%	1.58%	0.73%	0.73%	2.26%	0.68%	0.90%	0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLIN and DGIN in my portfolio?

FLIN and DGIN have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLIN or DGIN?

DGIN has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to FLIN (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIN dropped -41.90% vs DGIN's -33.65%.

Which ETF is better, FLIN or DGIN?

On 3-year performance, FLIN leads with 5.63% vs 5.17% for DGIN. On fees, FLIN is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLIN has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLIN or DGIN?

Over the 3-year period, FLIN has performed better with a 5.63% return vs 5.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLIN or DGIN?

FLIN is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for DGIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLIN or DGIN?

DGIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.42% for FLIN.

What is the main difference between FLIN and DGIN?

FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index, while DGIN tracks MVIS Digital India. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLIN and 0.76% for DGIN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.30 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.