PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLIIX vs. EIPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLIIX vs. EIPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIIX) and EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLIIX achieves a 7.62% return, which is significantly lower than EIPIX's 16.29% return.


FLIIX

1D
0.32%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
7.62%
6M
7.34%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
8.67%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*

EIPIX

1D
0.56%
1M
-3.35%
YTD
16.29%
6M
16.08%
1Y
21.71%
3Y*
20.66%
5Y*
15.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLIIX vs. EIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLIIX
First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
7.62%9.16%5.55%3.21%-4.06%12.94%-0.16%31.02%-6.06%11.43%
EIPIX
EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW)
16.29%11.31%26.74%6.25%16.19%21.80%-9.85%23.09%-11.68%-1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FLIIX and EIPIX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2017

0.72

The correlation between FLIIX and EIPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLIIX vs. EIPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLIIX
FLIIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FLIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FLIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

EIPIX
EIPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
EIPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLIIX vs. EIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIIX) and EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLIIXEIPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.37

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

4.76

-4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.10

13.91

-11.81

FLIIX vs. EIPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the EIPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLIIX and EIPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLIIX vs. EIPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLIIX drawdown since its inception was -35.85%, smaller than the maximum EIPIX drawdown of -43.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIIX and EIPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLIIXEIPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.85%

-43.98%

+8.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.57%

-4.51%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-13.00%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.61%

-16.71%

-3.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.48%

-3.78%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-5.01%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

1.54%

+1.52%

Volatility

FLIIX vs. EIPIX - Volatility Comparison

First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIIX) and EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX) have volatilities of 3.12% and 3.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLIIXEIPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

3.22%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

7.72%

+3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.46%

9.97%

+3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

15.60%

-1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.65%

18.69%

-3.04%

FLIIX vs. EIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLIIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPIX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLIIX vs. EIPIX - Dividend Comparison

FLIIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.52%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EIPIX
EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW)
13.52%15.71%7.60%4.09%25.10%3.44%4.02%3.44%3.45%1.77%0.78%
FLIIX
First Sentier Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
0.00%0.00%5.37%2.46%4.79%6.31%5.71%6.32%4.13%6.91%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLIIX and EIPIX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIPIX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to FLIIX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIIX dropped -35.85% vs EIPIX's -43.98%.

EIPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLIIX and EIPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer