FLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO
FLI.TO (CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF (Hedged Common Units)) and GOGY.TO (Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FLI.TO returned 15.01% vs 123.99% for GOGY.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLI.TO achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than GOGY.TO's 14.33% return.
FLI.TO
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 15.01%
- 3Y*
- 17.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
GOGY.TO
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -5.59%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 123.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLI.TO CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF (Hedged Common Units) | 3.96% | 9.22% |
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 14.33% | 80.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLI.TO and GOGY.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FLI.TO
GOGY.TO
FLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF (Hedged Common Units) (FLI.TO) and Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLI.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.62 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 6.19 | -4.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | 22.77 | -18.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLI.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 4.08 | -2.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 2.31 | -1.92 |
Drawdowns
FLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLI.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.31%, which is greater than GOGY.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLI.TO and GOGY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLI.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.31% | -20.87% | -35.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.00% | -20.14% | +10.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -10.57% | +7.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -5.07% | -2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 5.47% | -2.21% |
Volatility
FLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF (Hedged Common Units) (FLI.TO) is 3.56%, while Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO) has a volatility of 9.16%. This indicates that FLI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOGY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLI.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 9.16% | -5.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 21.42% | -11.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.75% | 30.67% | -16.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 34.61% | -16.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 34.61% | -10.98% |
Dividends
FLI.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Dividend Comparison
FLI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.52%, less than GOGY.TO's 12.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLI.TO CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF (Hedged Common Units) | 7.52% | 6.63% | 6.36% | 7.23% | 7.43% | 6.52% | 11.67% | 6.18% | 7.23% | 5.05% | 5.68% | 5.14% |
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 12.78% | 8.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLI.TO and GOGY.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and Harvest.
Find the right allocation for FLI.TO and GOGY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer