PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLHY vs. BBHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLHY vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty High Yield Corporate ETF (FLHY) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLHY achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than BBHY's 1.73% return.


FLHY

1D
0.12%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.45%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
9.36%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*

BBHY

1D
0.15%
1M
0.49%
YTD
1.73%
6M
2.18%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLHY vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLHY
Franklin Liberty High Yield Corporate ETF
1.87%9.26%8.70%13.40%-10.45%4.27%7.77%16.39%-1.31%
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.73%8.51%7.81%11.98%-10.37%3.88%5.36%14.35%-1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FLHY and BBHY is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2018

0.85

The correlation between FLHY and BBHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLHY vs. BBHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLHY
BBHY

Energy

1.9%
5.2%

Industrials

1.6%
8.4%

Technology

1.6%
4.0%

Healthcare

0.9%
5.4%

Basic Materials

0.7%
3.2%

Utilities

0.6%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.6%
10.0%

Financial Services

0.5%
4.1%

Communication Services

0.4%
7.9%

Real Estate

0.3%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
2.5%

Energy

FLHY
1.9%
BBHY
5.2%

Industrials

FLHY
1.6%
BBHY
8.4%

Technology

FLHY
1.6%
BBHY
4.0%

Healthcare

FLHY
0.9%
BBHY
5.4%

Basic Materials

FLHY
0.7%
BBHY
3.2%

Utilities

FLHY
0.6%
BBHY
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FLHY
0.6%
BBHY
10.0%

Financial Services

FLHY
0.5%
BBHY
4.1%

Communication Services

FLHY
0.4%
BBHY
7.9%

Real Estate

FLHY
0.3%
BBHY
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

FLHY
0.2%
BBHY
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLHY vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLHY
FLHY Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FLHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FLHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

BBHY
BBHY Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BBHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BBHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLHY vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty High Yield Corporate ETF (FLHY) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLHYBBHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

3.00

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.63

13.50

+1.12

FLHY vs. BBHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the BBHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLHY and BBHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLHYBBHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

1.97

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.57

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.64

+0.09

Drawdowns

FLHY vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLHY drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLHY and BBHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLHYBBHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.58%

-24.98%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.43%

-2.37%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.49%

-5.00%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.19%

-15.32%

+0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.14%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.54%

-2.37%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

0.53%

-0.01%

Volatility

FLHY vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Liberty High Yield Corporate ETF (FLHY) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) at 1.13%. This indicates that FLHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLHYBBHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

1.13%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

2.85%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

3.62%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.94%

7.26%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.11%

7.53%

+0.58%

FLHY vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLHY has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLHY vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison

FLHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, less than BBHY's 6.94% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.94%7.24%7.18%6.49%5.92%4.06%4.73%4.99%5.02%4.81%1.42%
FLHY
Franklin Liberty High Yield Corporate ETF
6.46%6.53%6.51%6.26%6.54%5.76%5.47%5.61%4.27%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FLHY and BBHY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLHY has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to BBHY (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLHY dropped -22.58% vs BBHY's -24.98%.

On 5-year performance, FLHY leads with 4.75% vs 4.12% for BBHY. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLHY has performed better with a 4.75% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FLHY.

BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 6.46% for FLHY.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FLHY and 0.15% for BBHY.

FLHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLHY and BBHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer