FLGV vs. IBTE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLGV (Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF) and IBTE (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. FLGV is actively managed, while IBTE is passively managed. FLGV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTE.

Performance

FLGV vs. IBTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FLGV

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 0.06%
• 6M: -0.23%
• 1Y: 3.99%
• 3Y*: 2.91%
• 5Y*: -0.17%
• 10Y*: —

IBTE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLGV vs. IBTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FLGV Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF	-0.34%
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

FLGV vs. IBTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGV

FLGV Risk / Return Rank: 29
FLGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FLGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FLGV Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FLGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FLGV Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLGV vs. IBTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLGV	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.20	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLGV	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.13	—	—

Drawdowns

FLGV vs. IBTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGV drawdown since its inception was -17.63%, which is greater than IBTE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGV and IBTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLGV	IBTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.63%	0.00%	-17.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.54%	0.00%	-5.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.73%	0.00%	-8.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLGV	IBTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.73%	0.00%	+3.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.43%	0.00%	+5.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.15%	0.00%	+5.15%

FLGV vs. IBTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLGV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLGV vs. IBTE - Dividend Comparison

FLGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, while IBTE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLGV Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF	4.15%	4.07%	4.13%	3.46%	2.21%	1.92%	0.97%
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FLGV or IBTE?

On fees, IBTE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLGV or IBTE?

IBTE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLGV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLGV or IBTE?

FLGV has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 0.00% for IBTE.

What is the main difference between FLGV and IBTE?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLGV and 0.07% for IBTE.