PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLGB vs. RFEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLGB vs. RFEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGB achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly higher than RFEU's 1.50% return.


FLGB

1D
-1.10%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
4.93%
6M
8.94%
1Y
18.89%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*

RFEU

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.50%
6M
4.12%
1Y
13.19%
3Y*
12.41%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
7.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLGB vs. RFEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
4.93%33.73%8.77%14.33%-6.00%17.14%-9.47%23.23%-11.60%1.12%
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
1.50%30.78%-1.78%16.19%-24.17%22.83%6.25%23.21%-17.57%0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FLGB and RFEU is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between FLGB and RFEU has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FLGB vs. RFEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLGB
RFEU

Financial Services

24.2%
18.9%

Industrials

14.2%
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

14.0%
9.3%

Healthcare

13.6%
13.3%

Energy

11.8%
8.7%

Basic Materials

8.6%
1.2%

Utilities

5.3%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
10.6%

Communication Services

2.6%
3.8%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Technology

0.7%
12.5%

Financial Services

FLGB
24.2%
RFEU
18.9%

Industrials

FLGB
14.2%
RFEU
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

FLGB
14.0%
RFEU
9.3%

Healthcare

FLGB
13.6%
RFEU
13.3%

Energy

FLGB
11.8%
RFEU
8.7%

Basic Materials

FLGB
8.6%
RFEU
1.2%

Utilities

FLGB
5.3%
RFEU
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FLGB
4.4%
RFEU
10.6%

Communication Services

FLGB
2.6%
RFEU
3.8%

Real Estate

FLGB
0.7%
RFEU

-

Technology

FLGB
0.7%
RFEU
12.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLGB vs. RFEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGB
FLGB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FLGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGB Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

RFEU
RFEU Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RFEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFEU Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
RFEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLGB vs. RFEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLGBRFEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.82

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.73

10.32

-3.58

FLGB vs. RFEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGB Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the RFEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGB and RFEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLGBRFEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.68

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.23

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.41

0.00

Drawdowns

FLGB vs. RFEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGB drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, which is greater than RFEU's maximum drawdown of -39.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGB and RFEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLGBRFEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.61%

-39.74%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.26%

-5.15%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.13%

-13.48%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.90%

-35.92%

+10.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.88%

-0.11%

-4.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-9.62%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

1.35%

+1.46%

Volatility

FLGB vs. RFEU - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) at 0.00%. This indicates that FLGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLGBRFEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

0.00%

+5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.14%

4.33%

+7.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

8.66%

+5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

16.76%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

17.85%

+1.12%

FLGB vs. RFEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLGB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RFEU's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLGB vs. RFEU - Dividend Comparison

FLGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than RFEU's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
3.33%3.50%4.42%3.95%4.23%2.93%2.67%4.30%3.92%0.43%0.00%
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
2.83%2.87%5.45%3.37%4.98%1.82%2.32%3.08%2.84%1.35%3.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLGB and RFEU have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLGB has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to RFEU (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGB dropped -42.61% vs RFEU's -39.74%.

On 5-year performance, FLGB leads with 10.55% vs 3.74% for RFEU. On fees, FLGB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, RFEU has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLGB has performed better with a 10.55% return vs 3.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for RFEU.

FLGB has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 2.83% for RFEU.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLGB and 0.83% for RFEU.

RFEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLGB and RFEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer